Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swanky San Francisco high-rise sinking, tilting (AKa the leaning high-rise of S.F)
Fox News.com ^ | August 1, 2016

Posted on 08/02/2016 7:35:46 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Kaslin
The 58-story Millennium Tower, located at 301 Mission Street just south of the city's financial district, was completed in 2008 and has sunk 16 inches and shifted 2 inches to the northwest since opening...

They mean the 57-story Millennium Tower.

41 posted on 08/02/2016 9:41:55 AM PDT by Flick Lives (TRIGGER WARNING - Posts may require application of sarcasm filter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

“perhaps the anchors/pilings are not always sufficient to support the entire weight of the building”

Then that would be a failure of the engineers. I’m no engineer or architect, but it’s just plain common sense that you anchor these kinds of buildings to bedrock with sufficient structural support so that the weight of the building is transferred to the bedrock and not the intervening material. Anything less is courting disaster.


42 posted on 08/02/2016 9:43:10 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
shifted 2 inches to the northwest

Great. Now the whole building will be full of slant-eyes.

43 posted on 08/02/2016 9:44:00 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
Pretty strange. Buildings of the size have to be anchored to bedrock.

Ideally, but sometimes not. In theory, depending on the ground, deep enough pilings should provide enough restive force for the weight of the building. Effectively the foundation "floats". Apparently calculations were off on the ground around this building and this one is "sinking".

44 posted on 08/02/2016 9:44:56 AM PDT by Flick Lives (TRIGGER WARNING - Posts may require application of sarcasm filter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wonder who the engineers were. Chinese?


45 posted on 08/02/2016 9:56:22 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess no one paid attention to the the Ocean Tower at South Padre.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_Tower


46 posted on 08/02/2016 10:04:13 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (You all can go to hell, I'm going to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

Maybe Mexican, who knows?


47 posted on 08/02/2016 10:10:20 AM PDT by Kaslin (He neededAwesome the ignorant to reelect him. He got them and now we have to pay the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Bet it’s tilting left.

It certainly is- from at least one direction.

48 posted on 08/02/2016 10:34:29 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

The $350M builder/owner could take the Larry Silverstein way out ... I’m sure there are a few million willing jihadi’s to call upon for a collision, then make the collapse happen.


49 posted on 08/02/2016 11:06:05 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for spiritual discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

You pond the pilings down until you hit bed rock.


50 posted on 08/02/2016 11:11:04 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stand an ISIS suicide bomber on the side of the building that’s offset from level and blow him up. See if that levels the building.


51 posted on 08/02/2016 11:24:02 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64; Boogieman
You pond the pilings down until you hit bed rock.

Suppose the bedrock is 100 feet down. It does not seem possible that a skyscraper could be built on 100 foot long legs, no matter how thick they were, without any cross-bracing. So the fill does have something to do with supporting the building.

According to some answers from engineers on Quora, foundations of skyscrapers do not always go to bedrock.

One of the piers of the Brooklyn Bridge does not go all the way to bedrock and yet it has stood for over 133 years.

52 posted on 08/02/2016 12:27:40 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Go see a pile-driver in action.


53 posted on 08/02/2016 12:33:05 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Pier 66, in Ft. Lauderdale did the same thing 70s!
I believe they used hundreds of tons pressurized grout to stabilize.


54 posted on 08/03/2016 9:06:57 AM PDT by GOYAKLA ( Pick-up the pace, I'm eighty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson