Posted on 06/26/2016 5:34:37 AM PDT by DaveA37
Oh no!
I hate you.
I hate you because you were first.
My stated opinion about snopes relates to the Curiel affair—there they have not been at all complete and seem to cherry pick and then not update when contrary information is presented. For run of the mill urban legend stuff, they are probably pretty good. With political matters, though, I won’t bother visiting the site any longer.
You entered it in / copied it wrong?
Have you noticed some error?
You indicated the links were wrong? I copied in and linked directly to a case where Kagan represented numbnuts. Were the others wrong?
I did not say the link was wrong, the claim that the case pertains to Obama’s citizenship is wrong.
Now we know why Obama nominated Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court.To verify this claim I checked the first case listed. It had nothing to do with Obama's citizenship. The article is not credible.Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time.
Ah. Okay. I looked at the broader issue that Kagan should recuse based on anything involved with Odumbo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.