Skip to comments.
Nissan proposes ethanol for future fuel cell cars, to avoid hydrogen fueling
Motor Authority ^
| June 15, 2016
| John Voelcker
Posted on 06/16/2016 3:42:13 PM PDT by jjotto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Interesting concept. Three or four years away isn't far in auto development.
1
posted on
06/16/2016 3:42:14 PM PDT
by
jjotto
To: jjotto
So they take a fuel that, due to its low carbon content,
isn’t as powerful as gasoline, reduce that carbon content to zero, and expect to get any vaguely reasonable mileage out of it???
To: libstripper
Not enough feedstock in the world, make it methanol now we can talk.
3
posted on
06/16/2016 3:52:32 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: jjotto
I really don't get it. Where does the energy to break the C-H bonds come from? If it comes from burning the ethanol, then how much energy is lost to strip the hydrogen from the remaining EtOH? And what are the chemical reactions here?
H3C-CH2OH -> ???
4
posted on
06/16/2016 3:57:45 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: jjotto
Pfft!
Crude is a gift from the Almighty.
Just over half goes to make gasoline.
Crude is used to make everything from highways to surgical plastics to fertilizers.
Pfft!
To: VTenigma
Make the fuel stock methane, then we have a viable concept.
Methane exists as a distinct and relatively pure compound in many places and from many sources, and while one molecule of carbon dioxide is produced for each two molecules of water, the production of carbon dioxide in and of itself is not a bad thing. In fact, that is an essential part of life.
But there is a HUGE reeducation program that must be introduced to reverse this flow of misinformation and downright lying. Then, finally, the advance of REAL science may begin anew.
6
posted on
06/16/2016 4:04:18 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
To: exDemMom
Slideshow at the link and wiki (direct-ethanol fuel cell) have basic explanations.
7
posted on
06/16/2016 4:06:39 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: jjotto
Ethanol is for drinking — not driving.
8
posted on
06/16/2016 4:10:00 PM PDT
by
353FMG
To: alloysteel
9
posted on
06/16/2016 4:14:10 PM PDT
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: jjotto
Rather than pumping hydrogen into the cars at very high pressure, the company proposes to offer a different kind of fuel-cell car one that is filled with ethanol instead.That fuel, or an ethanol-and-water blend, is "reformed" to produce a supply of hydrogen on board the car itself.
Yeah, waste energy "reforming" the ethanol into CO2 and H2, because that's better than burning the ethanol into CO2 and H2O. Brilliant!!!
10
posted on
06/16/2016 4:33:01 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
To: jjotto
"The company says it doesn't expect to have the technology commercialized until 2020."
Oil demand will probably be crossing production within 6 to 9 months, and it appears that bankers with interests in low energy prices have run out of schemes for the most part. It would probably be wise for many to live much closer to their jobs.
11
posted on
06/16/2016 4:39:00 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: libstripper
So they take a fuel that, due to its low carbon content, isnt as powerful as gasoline, reduce that carbon content to zero, and expect to get any vaguely reasonable mileage out of it???Fuel cells, not being thermodynamic cycles which must waste a significant fraction of their input heat energy, can approach 100% efficiency of the hydrogen fuel they consume. It is therefore not beyond the realm of reason that a system such as described might have respectable efficiency.
12
posted on
06/16/2016 4:39:39 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
To: jjotto
Okay, I see what is going on now. The ethanol is basically being used in a battery for a redox reaction. Instead of recharging the battery using an external power source, the ethanol is replaced. So the battery "charging" step takes place remotely, at the point where plants convert CO
2 into sugar using solar energy, and yeast ferments the sugar into EtOH.
This actually is not the same as hydrogen "fuel cell" technology, since it takes an energy input from some artificial source to "break" water into hydrogen and oxygen, in order to get a lesser amount of energy back from burning the hydrogen to reform water. Hydrogen fuel cells do not depend on redox reactions and are not batteries.
13
posted on
06/16/2016 4:40:33 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: jjotto
Shame they want to add water, I prefer my ethanol neat.
To: Tijeras_Slim
I doubt many people prefer 190/200 proof alcohol neat, so you’re a rarity.
15
posted on
06/16/2016 4:53:45 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Original Lurker
Crude is used to make everything from highways to surgical plastics to fertilizers. Agree. Crude is the most efficient energy source we have available on Earth. I believe more than 6,000 products come from crude oil. And get this, the equipment and machines that manufacture ethanol... use many crude oil products including diesel, gasoline, oil, lubricants, plastics, rubber, paints etc. In other words, without the crude there would be no ethanol manufacturing!
16
posted on
06/16/2016 5:19:08 PM PDT
by
roadcat
To: 353FMG
To: Toddsterpatriot
I would think that FReepers would understand the potential use of an ethanol fuel cell in a SHTF situation. Banking collapses, there’s an EBT zombie apocalypse, no food in grocery stores, but the infrastructure for gasoline is going to be no problem? I think not.
18
posted on
06/16/2016 5:43:37 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: jjotto
I would think that FReepers would understand the potential use of an ethanol fuel cell in a SHTF situation.Are we more concerned about SHTF or "carbon neutrality"?
19
posted on
06/16/2016 5:50:16 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
To: Toddsterpatriot
‘Carbon neutrality’ is modern pagan religion, not science.
20
posted on
06/16/2016 6:00:04 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson