Skip to comments.
Feds Spent $412,930 Studying ‘Relationship Between Gender and Glaciers’
http://freebeacon.com/ ^
| 03/09/2016
| Elizabeth Harrington
Posted on 03/09/2016 11:34:31 AM PST by massmike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: massmike
Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change, the paper by Mark Carey, a professor at the University of Oregon
A professor of what? Is this guy even a scientist?
To: AFret.
22
posted on
03/09/2016 12:05:16 PM PST
by
sparklite2
( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
To: massmike
And this my friends is exactly why we need trump. He has spent his own money on the campaign and has a strict budget and sticks with it even after the Cruz people criticized him in New Hampshire for not giving more money to his staff after realizing it wasn’t necessary. He won easily. That is who I want in charge of the United States budget.
23
posted on
03/09/2016 12:34:38 PM PST
by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: massmike
Feds Spent $412,930 Studying Relationship Between Gender and Glaciers Hey, even with giving money away to those who want to annihilate us, it's hard to ring up a $19 TRILLION debt, so you have to be very creative on how the tax dollars are thrown away. /s
24
posted on
03/09/2016 12:38:06 PM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(My Forefathers Would Be Shooting By Now!)
To: massmike
To: massmike
Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions, the paper said. I just have to believe there is a jokester who is just doing this to jerk people's chains and get a few bucks. Or he's totally deranged. What a load of crap. The people who vet these applications for funding of studies probably are only marginal readers. Like most of Congress. So if they can't understand it or can't read, it gets promoted up the ladder. Upstairs, people are too bust to read it. Just pass it and we'll find out what is in it type of thing.
26
posted on
03/09/2016 12:41:31 PM PST
by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: massmike
There is a classic Dick Van Dyke episode where Rob and Laura, by mistake, get invited to a party of intellectuals. The gibberish among the intellectuals is hilarious.
To: massmike
Rarely do we see an insane person write down in words a description of their delusion. This is one of them.
28
posted on
03/09/2016 1:11:40 PM PST
by
I want the USA back
(The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
To: massmike
The writers of this pabulum have a brilliant future in congressional politics.
29
posted on
03/09/2016 2:23:25 PM PST
by
Jack Hammer
(uff said.)
To: massmike
Too many adjectives in there for it to be a credible scientific paper.
30
posted on
03/09/2016 2:43:08 PM PST
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson