Posted on 03/08/2016 1:35:09 PM PST by Steelfish
Billionaire Backs Trump After Shocking Surprise
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3406635/posts
Billionare Investor (Tom Barrack) on Trump’s Negotiating Style. (two very interesting videos)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3406615/posts
YOU’VE HEARD THE RHETORIC, NOW LEARN THE TRUTH.
http://www.98percentapproval.com/
Trump University Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqfsbQGPLAE
Of course The Dear Leader who extracts sworn pledges of support cannot be exposed. Expect a torrent of responses from his devotees without even taking time to read the full article.
How many business ventures has Rubio undertaken?
How many has Cruz?
‘Nuff said....
The truth from you? Ha! Fat chance
Jebs brother Neil Bush joins Cruz finance team, possibly opening door to more Bush support
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3406722/posts
So where is the sweet spot when this matters. The 40th thread?
Five Reasons 8 Out Of 10 Businesses Fail
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericwagner/2013/09/12/five-reasons-8-out-of-10-businesses-fail/#49ed7e885e3c
Why So Many New Companies Fail During Their First Five Years
http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/178787/why-new-companies-fail-during-first-five-years.aspx
I’m saving that
Yeah...Through these “failed” business ventures, Trump has become a multi billionaire...
Damn!!! Business has really been hard on him....
I’ve observed that there are numerous fiercely-held stances based on the fact that someone did something profoundly stupid and they’re not willing to admit how horrible it was - so they have to rationalize it and defend it as a laudable superior choice, to the point of passionately recruiting others to join them in that bad choice. Abortions & tattoos being prime examples.
They fail to highlight his many successes. No, just report any failures he has had - almost all businessmen have had failures - it goes with the risk. It makes no difference to me.
Trump *is* establishment. He’s been playing in and with the establishment for some time. On the wrong side for a great deal of it, but..
So...the guy who tried had a few failures along the way to his resounding successes...so we’re supposed to ignore him and opt for the alternatives who never did anything meaningful in the real world?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.