Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Claim: positive CO2 feedback from plants due to “warm nights” will flood atmosphere with carbon
wattsupwiththat.com ^ | December 7, 2015 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 12/08/2015 9:12:06 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2015 9:12:06 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Oooh 0.6 degrees in 60 years, the sky is falling.


2 posted on 12/08/2015 9:13:57 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
WTF!!!

Reduce the plants.....?

Stop farming!???

BAck to the Stone Age????

3 posted on 12/08/2015 9:14:48 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just more Bull


4 posted on 12/08/2015 9:15:53 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

5 posted on 12/08/2015 9:18:15 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This feedback should have already occurred and have been predicted by their “models”.

Always, always remember what scientists and engineers call those students who had only the intellect for politics or community organizing, but somehow cheated/paid their way into passing: Climate Researchers.


6 posted on 12/08/2015 9:19:06 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
First of all, we can't do anything about carbon dioxide.

Secondly, the plants need that carbon dioxide in order to do their jobs of supplying us with oxygen.

These people must think we are utter fools.

7 posted on 12/08/2015 9:20:52 AM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Deserts are nice and cold at night. No plants, no carbon, no nothing.

The pinheads conducting the “study” seem to have conveniently forgotten about conservation of matter. When plants ultimately die and decay, they give up all of the CO2 they “sequestered”. All of it.


8 posted on 12/08/2015 9:21:40 AM PST by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Smokin' Joe; thackney; TigersEye; Marine_Uncle; SierraWasp; ...

We are doomed!??


9 posted on 12/08/2015 9:28:17 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Fred Nerks

fyi


10 posted on 12/08/2015 9:29:50 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Will also lead to more oxygen by that reasoning, more food by other reasoning.

Get back to me when they sucessfully model the largest “greenhouse” gas: water vapor.


11 posted on 12/08/2015 9:31:13 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's okay, really.

The tropics become deserts. The temperate regions become tropics, the tundra sprouts trees. There is a heck of a lot of land north of the 48th parallel that would benefit by warmer temperatures and become more lush and forested rather than be tundra and steppe. So there's your carbon sink.

12 posted on 12/08/2015 9:32:38 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
When plants ultimately die and decay, they give up all of the CO2 they “sequestered”. All of it.

Make mud! Bury the plants and make more coal (oh, they'll love that!)

13 posted on 12/08/2015 9:34:09 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
which have risen by about 0.6 degrees Celsius (33 degrees Fahrenheit) since 1959.

a rise of .6C is actually about 1.08F..........the way it's printed is comparing the temperature of .6C to the equivalent of F which is 33 degrees....If they're going to write bull crap then at least get their fraudulent facts correct.

14 posted on 12/08/2015 9:43:10 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
****************************EXCERPTS*****************************************

179 thoughts on “Claim: positive CO2 feedback from plants due to “warm nights” will flood atmosphere with carbon”

*******************************************

Trebla says:

December 7, 2015 at 5:21 pm

That’s obviously ridiculous. If the amount of plant mass increases with increased CO2 levels, the plants are converting CO2 into plant matter at a greater rate, and regardless of how they breathe, more carbon is captured in the plant itself as plant matter. The plants don’t create CO2 out of nothing. For the plants to increase the atmospheric CO2 level, they would have to decrease in mass themselves which is the opposite to reality (ref. the greening of the planet and case/control studies of plant growth under enhanced CO2 levels)

****************************************************************

prjindigo says:

December 7, 2015 at 11:38 pm

Plants and trees survive darkness by converting sugar to energy and heat, the warmer the night the LESS they need that energy for warmth. There is an effect where trees will actually protect the grass underneath them in parts of the world where frost is just an early morning event that then goes away. The trees are generating heat, the average plants DO NOT DO IT. They simply die.

Its the energy cycle of the plants. This is why in dense no-breeze conifer copses you can get that “not enough air” effect, they’ve chewed up a higher average of the ambient oxygen overnight and replaced it with a denser gas.

*************************************************

TomB says:

December 8, 2015 at 8:28 am

Well, since you replied to tobyglyn’s post, I have to assume you’re one of those horrible “de-nayers” with his head in the sand. Running off on some crazy rant about “more plants means more breathing” or some-such nonsense whilst refusing to address – at all – the unicorn issue!

****************************************************

Bob Burban says:

December 7, 2015 at 5:53 pm

You are so wrong … 97% of scientists agree that unicorns poop diamonds

**************************************************

ROFL!!!


15 posted on 12/08/2015 9:43:28 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Science 101 bump...


16 posted on 12/08/2015 9:44:02 AM PST by newfreep (TRUMP/Cruz 2016 - "Evil succeeds when good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Why China Shouldn’t Be Trusted on Its Climate Commitment

Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

17 posted on 12/08/2015 11:44:06 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Terrorism, the thing that shall not be named by the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I want to bump the CO2 up to 1600 ppm, that is, approximately fourfold what it is now.

Because: Green.

Who's with me on this?

18 posted on 12/08/2015 11:55:20 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Enquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm with you...I want to see Antarctica totally ice free, the entire huge continent exposed, mountains and rivers as it used to be, before the big chill that froze the deserts and the lakes...as it will be, because all that ice is simply part of a long term cycle imo...and 'global warming' has nothing to do with it.


19 posted on 12/08/2015 1:04:28 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ...
Yeah, and then the massive accumulation of heat energy sequestered at the bottoms of the oceans will suddenly rise, raising atmospheric temperatures by 30 degrees and melting the icecaps overnight, resulting in thousands of mass shootings, millions of rapes, worldwide jihad... /s Thanks Ernest.

20 posted on 12/08/2015 1:08:46 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson