Skip to comments.
Browser history: Obstruction of justice? Wiping Internet tracks is Obstruction
Examiner.com ^
| 6-8-15
| Linsey Bald
Posted on 06/10/2015 6:07:01 AM PDT by TurboZamboni
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: TurboZamboni
with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation...Key part. The rest is just hyperventilating.
21
posted on
06/10/2015 8:06:37 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: TurboZamboni
“with the intent to ....”
That language should make it pretty impossible to prosecute ordinary individuals who are clearing their history. The prosecutor would have to prove your intent is to thwart justice, rather than, say, privacy concerns. That’s going to be basically impossible unless you are stupid enough to admit that is why you did it.
To: TurboZamboni
The ISP has all the history.
Google has the history of all your searches.
The NSA has everything.
To: pgyanke
Key part. The rest is just hyperventilating. They don't have to tell you they're investigating, I believe. It's for you to find out later, after they bring charges for whatever, and grab your hard drive, and find out that you've flushed your history.
Just more charges to lard on the peasant. But NOT on our Masters - see H. Clinton & L. Lerner.
24
posted on
06/10/2015 3:11:49 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
To: Boogieman; TurboZamboni
That language should make it pretty impossible to prosecute ordinary individuals who are clearing their history. The prosecutor would have to prove your intent is to thwart justice, rather than, say, privacy concerns. That’s going to be basically impossible unless you are stupid enough to admit that is why you did it. It's for charge-larding.
25
posted on
06/10/2015 3:12:45 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
To: kiryandil
That’s why we have so many laws.
They’ll get you for 20 violations so you plea bargain to 3 or go bankrupt fighting them all.
26
posted on
06/10/2015 3:51:30 PM PDT
by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: TurboZamboni
They’ll get you for 20 violations so you plea bargain to 3 or go bankrupt fighting them all. Yeah, that scenario is probably buried somewhere in the Federalist Papers, or the Anti-Federalist Papers.
It's exactly as the Founders envisioned. Or not.
Actually, the Founders probably would have strung up more than a few prosecutors by now...
27
posted on
06/10/2015 5:36:27 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
To: Steely Tom
The IRS got away with it scot free. You make it sound like "peasant law " applies to the IRS...
28
posted on
06/10/2015 5:37:57 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson