Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Tests Electromagnetic Catapult on CVN 78
Product Design and Development ^ | 5/19/2015 | PEO Carriers Public Affairs

Posted on 05/20/2015 9:33:27 AM PDT by Rio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: rednesss

I have searched for solid news references to validate the claim I repeated, and cannot find any official confirmation that Russians actually did disable the USS Donald Cook ship with an aircraft EW EMP device.
I retract my claim due to insufficient evidence it really took place.


41 posted on 05/20/2015 2:00:38 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Please see my post to redress retracting the claim that a Russian aircraft EW EMP disabled the USS Donald Cook last year. I cannot find a credible news source that verified it happened.


42 posted on 05/20/2015 2:03:09 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1; USNBandit; rlmorel
wonder if the stroke will be progressive?
43 posted on 05/20/2015 3:15:46 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; doorgunner69

My memory tells me a full external fuel tank was 2000 lbs plus the weight of the tank, which may have been 200 lbs.

It was so long ago...:)


44 posted on 05/20/2015 5:27:29 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Did they have a larger tank on the centerline? I was in during the Seventies, and recall they were 2000+ lbs.


45 posted on 05/20/2015 5:29:24 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit; doorgunner69; pabianice

LOL...if that was the case, can you imagine the Navy people just leaving it up to the engineers assuming they would design them to work similarly to the current ones, then when they go to test, the engineers tell them

ENGINEER: “Sorry...you can’t have full external fuel tanks to get shot off with this thing...you have to empty them out.”

PILOT: “What? What the Hell is this thing good for, then?”

ENGINEER: “Well, we don’t have all that dirty, nasty, steam, and this thing, with a gazillion electron volts generates one awesome pulse! And you can fling bags of garbage soooo far in front of the the ship that the Russian trawlers can’t get to them before they sink!”

LOL, or they DON’T tell them, and the tanks get ripped off on launch!

Pabianice, where did you get that info from? I just have a hard time believing that you can’t launch with full external tanks. I know the state of American engineering is degraded, but I can’t believe they would allow THAT compromise. It sounds crazy.


46 posted on 05/20/2015 5:43:38 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit; doorgunner69; pabianice

Ah. I just went and did a search, they simply have to adjust the algorithm of the software that controls it...didn’t sound like a bit deal in a couple of articles.

That makes sense. If it was standard steam, they would probably have to make physical changes to the infrastructure, but with this, they probably just moderate the pulse in a specific way via the software to decrease the initial shear force.


47 posted on 05/20/2015 5:48:13 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson