Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "Gay Gestapo" VICTORY unless American Churches DIVORCE Church IRS 501-C3 Tax-Exempt Status
Church DIVORCE from IRS 501-C3 -- "Render Unto Caesar" ! -- YouTube Video ^ | 2015-04-04 | Patton@Bastogne

Posted on 04/05/2015 2:28:30 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: jaydee770
>>.Why would that stop a federal “black-robed-bandit” from penalizing a church for refusing to perform a gay marriage or whatever

It probably wouldn't...which is why we have discussed getting out of the marriage biz altogether. We would still do religious ceremonies between members of the congregation...but if you wanted a license, you would have to go to the courthouse and get a JP to do it.

We have also discussed (if push ever comes to shove on this issue) dissolving the church at the next business meeting and donating all property and furnishing to a brand new entity. If we have to do that every Sunday...so be it. We will not yield to the gastopo.

41 posted on 04/07/2015 10:26:16 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic
.

I'm sorry to tell you, but IRS 501(C) is "indeed" a contract.

Remember Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker ? Jim served time in "federal prison" for violation of his IRS 501-C3 "enrichment clause" FEDERAL CONTRACT.


Also, download the (below) referenced IRS Pamphlet P1828 which outlines in DETAIL the "compliance term and conditions" of this Federal Contract.

 photo IRS-950_zpsa5223654.jpg

Muster up the courage to do the free IRS download of "Pamplet P1828" which specifies the legal details of your tax-exempt church's servitude to it's U.S. Government Masters.


IRS Legal Obligations of Tax-Exempt Christian Churches and Pastors" - (click)




42 posted on 04/07/2015 12:18:47 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic; EternalVigilance
.


The "law" that you discuss changing is the creation of IRS Section 501(C)(3) in the "Johnston Amendment of 1954" ...

Check out this link ...

Source: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3512457?sid=21106380266413&uid=70&uid=3739600&uid=2&uid=4&uid=2129&uid=3739256



God and Country

Military Religious Freedom and Christian Service

MenuSkip to contentGod and Country

House Bill would Repeal Johnson Amendment

25 April 2012

The US House of Representatives recently introduced HR 3600, a bill that would repeal a portion of the IRS 501(c)3 code commonly known as the Johnson Amendment:

The Johnson Amendment was passed by Congress in 1954 [and] states that entities who are exempt from federal income tax cannot:

Participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of – or in opposition to – any candidate for public office.

This portion of law has been used as a tool to prevent churches from engaging in political speech about particular candidates.

Churches had always been tax-exempt, because the government recognized that that which the government taxed it was entitled to control.  It was even considered an inappropriate entanglement with religion (in re judicial interpretation of the First Amendment) to tax religious bodies. 

Starting in 1954, however, Lyndon Johnson created a unique situation in which the government could now control that which it did not tax.

The House bill is entitled, appropriately enough:

To restore the Free Speech and First Amendment rights of churches and exempt organizations by repealing the 1954 Johnson Amendment

The bill would remove the restriction regardless of religious affiliation, meaning any tax-exempt organization would be free to engage in political endorsement or opposition.


43 posted on 04/07/2015 12:29:33 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

If they establish your organization as one which enjoys government benefits, they ultimately have the power to control you.


44 posted on 04/07/2015 12:34:14 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
.


You nailed it ... PERFECTLY ...


.

45 posted on 04/07/2015 12:41:36 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

“Contracts” are specific legal instruments. Laws are not contracts. The video is wrong.

By the way, the legal nomenclature is IRC Section 501(c)(3). IRC means “Internal Revenue Code.”

Jim Bakker was sent to prison for eight counts of mail fraud, 15 counts of wire fraud, and one count of conspiracy. IRC §501(c)(3) was not part of the criminal lawsuit.

As I said before, pastors are free to preach about Biblical truths. Pastors can say that to have an abortion is a mortal sin. They can say that homosexuals are going to hell. Whatever they believe, they can say. Shoot, considering that the Bible was used as a basis for anti-miscegenation laws, they can still preach that it’s a sin for whites to marry blacks if that is what they feel the Bible says.

The author of the video feels strongly that it isn’t enough for pastors to preach Biblical truths. He feels that pastors have to spell out, literally, for his parishioners how they must vote in elections. Does the pastor feel that his sermons about Biblical truths are inadequate for educating his flock? Or does he think them so utterly stupid that they won’t pick up on what he’s saying?


46 posted on 04/07/2015 8:15:20 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ConstantSkeptic
.


The video is legally correct.

Just go ask the U.S. Supreme Court.



You are "absolutely" correct in that “Contracts” are specific legal instruments.



Church acceptance of the IRS 501-C3 "terms and conditions" ... ie ...

1) contributors are allowed to write-off church donations on their federal income tax

in exchange for ...

2) church leader promise to stay out of political issues or candidate election endorsements ...

is a "perfect" example of a legally enforceable contract.



Thanks for helping me explain that better.

It's akin to a state issued driver's licence.

You get to drive in "Texas" so long as you promise to obey "Texas driving laws" (mandatory insurance, speed limits, etc).



Churches WITHOUT the IRS 501-C3 "federal contract" can engage in political activity (issues & endorsements) ANYTIME they wish.



Please DOWNLOAD and read the IRS P1828 guideline (internet link provided twice on this tread).

IRS P1828 was written and published EXPRESSLY for the purpose of "helping" tax-exempt churches understand the TERMS and CONDITIONS of IRS 501-C3.



A contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract is a contract.


.
47 posted on 04/08/2015 4:47:05 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson