Skip to comments.
Oceans not acidifying – “scientists” hid 80 years of pH data
joannenova.com.au ^
| January 5th, 2015
| Joanne
Posted on 01/10/2015 12:20:59 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In any field truth is the enemy of those with less-than-honorable agendas.
2
posted on
01/10/2015 12:25:40 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: MeshugeMikey; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; TigersEye; Fred Nerks; GeronL; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Geez... how many nails does this coffin take?
4
posted on
01/10/2015 12:28:48 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
5
posted on
01/10/2015 12:29:26 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And .. the hokus-pokus garbage continues to try to prove global warming and all sorts of junk science.
6
posted on
01/10/2015 12:30:46 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
("The hope and changey stuff did not work, even a smidgen.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“But all the Science is in..” /s
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What happened to “acid rain”
20 years ago that was all we heard from the MSM here in the midwest and east.
The forests were defoliating at a prodigious rate!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The politicians who jump on board with this fraud should be forced to walk the plank into their so-called “acid ocean.”
9
posted on
01/10/2015 12:33:37 PM PST
by
jonrick46
(The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
When I was a kid we called this sort of thing FRAUD, They ALL BELONG IN PRISON.
When you realize that all of this FRAUD was used to get MONEY from the TAXPAYERS, Prison is probably too lenient.
10
posted on
01/10/2015 12:33:53 PM PST
by
eyeamok
To: Kirkwood
Most folks with a cognitive brain have been ignoring the alarmists for some time. Anytime you see the kind of full court press marketing that accompanied AGW, you can figure someone’s got a money making scheme that involves persuading the public to buy something whether it’s big macs or AGW.
When fast food chains license Disney characters you know it’s fantasy and marketing. Not much difference with AGW. The poor polar bears were an early indicator. Nothing sells like a sob story.
11
posted on
01/10/2015 12:38:46 PM PST
by
meatloaf
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Fascinating, but not surprising! I teach General Biology in our local community college. My colleagues are great people and some are even Christians as I am, but they stubbornly cling to the idea of AGW. Scientists are taught that they should be objective in their interpretation of experimental data, but in this case they are completely biased. I do my best to be the lone voice of reason in the department and to make my students aware of the contradictory evidence so they can at least have all the information they need to make their own decision.
12
posted on
01/10/2015 12:40:41 PM PST
by
srmorton
(Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death,....therefore, choose life..")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If anyone had bothered to actually plot the confidence intervals for that data, they find a fairly large spread about the linear regression. You could potentially fit a slew of regressions to that data and it would still be within the bounds of probability because the data is clearly cyclical. Lots of problems fitting 2nd order linear regressions to cyclical data unless there is a secondary overlaid trend occurring.
13
posted on
01/10/2015 12:41:23 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Oops, someone’s going to lose their grant money.
14
posted on
01/10/2015 12:41:43 PM PST
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Kirkwood
‘Fake but accurate,’ goes along way in our liberal world.
15
posted on
01/10/2015 12:44:33 PM PST
by
deadrock
(I is someone else.)
To: deadrock
Re: fake but accurate
I read an op-ed in our local Gannett generipaper the other day by some black guy
Republicans talked a lot about "drill baby drill" but Obama was the one who made it happen
/puke
To: nascarnation
17
posted on
01/10/2015 12:55:14 PM PST
by
deadrock
(I is someone else.)
To: deadrock
Pretty much. You can get statistics to say anything when you have probability to work with. Like we see here, just taking the data from the end of the sample gives you a completely different trend than if you took the whole sample. Both tests were done correctly within their defined boundary conditions, but guess which one is hiding the truth and which one is the more historically accurate. more predictive, and has a narrower confidence interval?
18
posted on
01/10/2015 1:04:57 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The fallacies continue to be exposed. Sadly. Such news seldom enters
the minds of the masses however.
19
posted on
01/10/2015 1:07:20 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Galt level is not far away......but alas! Honor must be earned...)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Oops, someones going to lose their grant money.Or get more so they can hide the grift better.
20
posted on
01/10/2015 1:08:11 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson