Posted on 03/28/2014 5:17:22 AM PDT by C19fan
Which came first, the chicken or the can’t read. I can make a case that they can’t read so they don’t read. It shows up in their abysmal lack of vocabulary.
I once saw an editorial in the Houston Chronicle where the editor used “loose” when she meant “lose”. I see it all the time (in FR too) and it grates on me, but it isn’t the only confused use of English vocabulary that has become endemic in the population. The use of shorthand words and phrases in ‘texting’ will accelerate the decline in writing skills. Believe me, I’m not rotflmao.
However, your assertion that you have to have good reading skills—and use them—in order to become a decent writer is correct.
It is a chicken and egg situation. When I was three, I didn’t know how to read. By the time was 10, I was devouring history books. How did I learn to read?
By reading.
The researcher’s findings a couple of months ago that claimed some UNC sport students were reading on a 5th grade level makes more sense now.
Age Range: 8 and up
Grade Level: 3 and up
Paperback: 208 pages
Publisher: Puffin (January 1, 1999)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0141301201
For what cause? Who would make that call?
I didn’t think it was that badly written.
And it wasn’t a bad summary of what happened to Rosa Parks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.