Good shoot by cop. Good riddance to roid-rage drunk.
BTW....cop was unconcious when help arrived. Required surgery.
Here is picture of the cop. The front of his face looks like the back of Zimmerman's head.
Posted on 02/26/2014 8:38:36 PM PST by Uncle Chip
Nick have you ever try and arrest an drunk that likes to fight.
because it’s the easiest way to get a paid vacation.
Their are rules in mix martial arts their are no rules on the street.
Did you watch the video or read the article???
The police officer had to have facial reconstructive surgery.
Good shoot by cop. Good riddance to roid-rage drunk.
BTW....cop was unconcious when help arrived. Required surgery.
Here is picture of the cop. The front of his face looks like the back of Zimmerman's head.
The article specifically says he was wearing his police uniform.
The title was written by the firefighters union --
Have you ever tried to handle a drunk? Even the best trained cops can tell you it can be rough. Some drunks develop “Retard” strength and can throw people around like crazy.
I don’t blame the cop for shooting him...
Coercive Elite versus Mundane. What do you think a Grand Jury is going to do?
I mean, Bill Clinton (Elite) lied to a Grand Jury. How many years did he spend in jail, again?
The Coercive Elite thugs who murdered Kelly Thomas were found "not guilty" by a Grand Jury.
Merkuns don't understand the nature of the paramilitary standing army that's overrun the United States. Perhaps we need to start educating FReepers about the evolution of the police in America from few and far between "law enforcement" constable-types before the 1830s, to a ubiquitous malicious paramilitary tax-feeder presence in every sphere of public life today.
The Founding Fathers didn't intend for this obscenity to happen.
Whatever you do don’t read the article or watch the video. Just continue in your ranting from thread to thread.
So they both were drunk. Gotcha.
Perhaps not, but there are rules when arresting a citizen. I’m not sure if knees to the head are included.
Actually, no.
The uncounted hordes of militarized American police are being specifically trained these days to "confront" the peasantry no matter where the peasants are or what they are doing.
The paramilitaries are also trained to "not let it go", because dozens of their brethren will show up like a pack of coon dogs to swarm over a scene of peasant resistance.
The FEO initiated the "confrontation". Zimmerman didn't initiate the confrontation with Saint Trayvon of the Holy Skittles.
Bad analogy. The Founding Fathers would be aghast at the swarms of Tacticool-clad gunthugs eating out the substance of the peasantry, and "confronting" them at every turn.
Both? who are you talking about?
Does that mean that the other side in a debate against you can make their own facts up, too?
It's a yes or no question, Uncle ChipDip.
I read the article. The Coercive Elite gunthug "confronted" the Mundane firefighter.
In peasant speak, "he started it".
Now, if a CCW Mundane pulled crap like that, he's going to prison. Period.
Odd that the King's Men in their Magic Blue Costumes are not subject to the same rules...
One of the rules of FR is to leave your disputes on the thread where it occurred and not carry it from thread to thread.
You don’t seem to be able to abide by that rule anymore than the screaming banshee could obey a traffic signal or a simple order to stop or a request for her name.
Why don’t you take another shot at that rule — I’ll bet you keep it if you try.
Odd. Then why did you post this to ME before I mentioned the other thread?:
Just continue in your ranting from thread to thread.
We have one Uncle Chip rule already: "I can lie, you can't".
Do we add a second Uncle Chip rule: "Do as I say, not as I do"?
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.....
By the way - you're deflecting from the fact that the off-duty gunthug (who was wearing his Official Intimidation Costume anyway) "confronted" the firefighter peasant in a move which would have gotten a CCW peasant prison time.
Why are we avoiding that uncomfortable fact, Uncle Chip?
You’ve dropped your IQ far enough for one month — why don’t you take the next month off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.