Posted on 02/14/2014 3:51:56 PM PST by Kartographer
Considering the circumstances, would you not do the same?
I guess you believe in global warming too...
No but I do believe that there just might a few people here in Albuquerque working out at Kirkland that just might know a bit more about EMP than even a premiere experienced researcher such as yourself.
“No but I do believe that there just might a few people here in Albuquerque working out at Kirkland that just might know a bit more about EMP than even a premiere experienced researcher such as yourself.”
There might be, but you haven’t actually talked to them have you. You just drank the cool-aid..
You want to talk about blowing smoke when you claim to have more knowledge of the subject than people form Livermore Labs, Oak Ridge and Los Alamos and you avoid all question about what gives you the expertise and the knowledge that these people are wrong?
So I will ask you again:
I asked you to review the commissions report and show where in your expert opinion their conclusions are wrong and where they erred and why in your learned opinion they are wrong? I would especially I like to hear your knowledgeable take on their conclusion in regards to the Starfish Nuclear Detonation and again why they are wrong.
http://www.empcommission.org/docs/empc_exec_rpt.pdf
I ask you to review the report since we are talking about EMP from a nuclear denotation and not lightening I like to compare apples to apples and learn from you on studies, observations and research on the effects of detonatonations. I am curious how many nuclear detonations have you observed and of what types and yields? What was your field of study that gave you your surpior knowledge over three of the premiere nuclear labs in the world?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.