Posted on 12/02/2013 4:31:18 PM PST by Kevmo
If you’re a CMNS physicist, you would probably understand that stuff. I’m not. As far as I can tell, there isn’t a single CMNS FReeper physicist. There are some smart cookies, but no freeper specializing in this area.
What is ridiculous is you talk about inductive reasoning but will not share with us the results of your inductive reasoning. Are you ashamed of it?
Allow me to walk you through an inductive exercise.
This Pons-Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated more than 14,000 times.
Do you accept that scientific fact?
And even though the Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated hundreds of
times by more than a thousand scientists, even in mainstream peer-reviewed
journals.
https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/8k5n17605m135n22/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xwvgza45j4sqpe3wceul4dv2&sh=www.springerlink.com
.
Jing-tang He
• Nuclear fusion inside condense matters
• Frontiers of Physics in China
Volume 2, Number 1, 96-102, DOI: 10.1007/s11467-007-0005-8
This article describes in detail the nuclear fusion inside condense
matters—the Fleischmann-Pons effect, the reproducibility of cold fusions,
self-consistency of cold fusions and the possible applications
.
Note that Jing-tang He found there were 14,700 replications of the Pons
Fleischmann Anomalous Heat Effect.
http://www.boliven.com/publication/10.1007~s11467-007-0005-8?q=(%22David%20J.%20Nagel%22)
.
National Instruments is a multibillion dollar corporation that does not
need to stick its neck out for “bigfoot stories”. After noting more than
150 replications, they recently concluded that with so much evidence of
anomalous heat generation...
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf
Conclusion
• There is an unknown physical event and there is a need of better
measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating
innovation and discovery.
Great. When can I buy a unit?
Again, you demonstrate a complete inability to reason inductively. And this is a very, very simple exercise. You act as if what you’re posting is somehow wise, but all it really does is showcase your own stupidity.
I’m asking how does this help me. You treat that question as a personal insult.
Here. For the PTSIFOM crowd. Buy one now.
It is WAY over my head.
I was just talking to Ben Jr. about when I first heard of cold fusion, and how excited I was (at the time) about what it meant for the future.
Then the whole thing turned out to be over-hyped at best. Kinda surprised it is still being investigated. Hope something good comes of it soon.
No, I do not treat that question as a personal insult, because you have not asked it until now.
You’ve asked other things, all of which show an inability to reason inductively.
How does this help you? By “this”, do you mean “this” theory that “this” thread is about? If that’s your own personal necessity for a theory, you’re better off logging onto Martha Stewart threads. At least you’ll get a good recipe.
You’re so cute. I just love your schtick.
It’s not you, it’s me.
Well, recently an open sourced LENR project measured gamma rays. So anyone following their recipe would be able to as well. And sure enough, Hans Biberian did just that, within 48 hours.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3091404/posts
Well, congratulations!
You managed to write at least one post that doesn’t showcase your complete inability to reason inductively. Well, maybe, as long as you’re not engaging the logical fallacy of the horse laugh.
asked & answered
———————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg85823.html-———————
There was a “Low Temperature Fusion” chapter in the seminal “Project Sherwood” book of 1958.
Amazing that , at heart, no advances in fusion of any temperature have been made in over half a century!
I believe advances are being made slowly, right under our noses.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
No answer at all. Again I get nothing clicking on your link.
That’s because you’re too lazy to copy & paste it into your browser. Don’t give me that PTSIFOM bowlsheet. Complain to FR that its HTML auto-detect software is gronked... ain’t my problem.
Do you accept that scientific fact?
It’s a simple question. You claim you’re interested in inductive reasoning results, so answer the question.
Nothing you’ve shown me is worth the effort. You have something to share, share it.
Here is the text of the post you are responding to:
Great. When can I buy a unit?
The response to that post is irrational. It doesn’t make sense, inductive or otherwise.
Nothing you’ve shown me is worth the effort.
***I know. Cutting & pasting a URL is just SO MUCH trouble. Not.... worth... the... effort... but ... still... must... write .... snarky .... post.
You’re just here to troll. Typical skeptopath PTSIFOM nonsense.
asked & answered
-————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87491.html———————
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.