Woman on front page of healthcare.gov disappears

Twitchy ^ | 10/27/2013 | Twitchy

[nascarnation]

Somebody capable of Photoshop needs to put her on the side of a milk carton

[so_real]

If a screw-up of this magnitude had happened under a Republican administration, every single committee and subcommittee chairman - from both houses of Congress - would be rushing to the MSM cameras to announce hearings to begin tomorrow morning.

Bingo! It *was* supposed to fail under a Republican administration: Mitt Romney's. That was the setup. But, fortunately for the republican's, the socialists underestimated how unpalatable Mitt Romney (original ObamaCare author) was to conservatives. They narrowly avoided disaster (though I suspect strongly that some we would consider GOPe were involved in the hustle).

[Fzob]

Those are some nasty looking gums

[Steely Tom]

I’ll tell you one thing: she looks healthy.

[freeandfreezing]

You forgot to include all of those people whose insurance has been cancelled thanks to Obamacare who now need to go buy new insurance.

[Lee N. Field]

The teeth make him look scary.

[DuncanWaring]

Clearly not British.

[Kickass Conservative]

Of course she looks Healthy, that’s the “before” picture.

[RightGeek]

[informavoracious]

Don’t buy the propaganda! Volumes are not the problem. Interfaces are the problem. Poor design, incomplete coding, and inadequate testing are the problem. As even the Congressional Dems have pointed out, Amazon does not crash the week before Christmas nor ProFlowers on Valentine’s Day in spite of tremendous volume.

[keats5]

When the feds finally get these paper applications, they still have to put them into the computer.

So how’s that gonna work?

[Mike Darancette]

Looks like for supplement quotes they passed off to Kaiser estimator. LOL

[RavenATB]

There’s never been a screw-up of this magnitude in any previous administration, or any previous generation, or any previous century. This is the most spectacular failure of leadership and management in the history of mankind.

Not only were they unable to create a fairly simple web site which required technology that is at least 10 years old, and not only could no national leader explain what happened...specifically... that caused this failure...there isn’t a single person in the administration who CAN EVEN NAME the person who was in charge of this screw-up.

The single most basic premise of project management is, “WHO THE HELL IS IN CHARGE.” It’s bad to fail. But not even being professional enough to know who was responsible for the success and/or failure of the web site design and stand-up is an unimaginable failure of leadership.

[okie01]

It’s bad to fail. But not even being professional enough to know who was responsible for the success and/or failure of the web site design and stand-up is an unimaginable failure of leadership.

C'mon, we all know who would've been responsible for a success...had there been one.

[Steely Tom]

...there isn’t a single person in the administration who CAN EVEN NAME the person who was in charge of this screw-up.

This happens in every post-baby-boom Democrat administration. Remember Craig Livingstone?