South Carolina man who shot unarmed teenager dead will NOT face trial under......

mail online ^ | James Nye

[Morgana]

One for Zimmerman?

[Tax-chick]

'Just to think he took my child's life away when my baby was helping his child get home.'

Um, yeah, for sure.

[Tax-chick]

This article is garbled even by Daily Mail standards. Was young Mr. “Boo Boo” Niles in the car with the teenaged girls who were shooting at Mr. Scott’s house? And where was the baby?

[Morgana]

Yea I know. “Her baby” was 17! So that was her grandbaby he was taking home? Some mom!

[Tax-chick]

I like the way he was “helping his child get home,” as if the child was capable of getting home on its own. Wherever home is. Whoever the child is.

Who are these people?

[Morgana]

“I like the way he was “helping his child get home,” as if the child was capable of getting home on its own. “

Come on TC the lad is only 17 so I figure his child is only what? An infant to about two years? Strapped in a car seat maybe?

“Who are these people?”

Obama voters!

[Tax-chick]

Obama voters!

Good point.

[SIDENET]

This article is garbled even by Daily Mail standards. Was young Mr. “Boo Boo” Niles in the car with the teenaged girls who were shooting at Mr. Scott’s house? And where was the baby?

Yeah, that's what I want to know, too.

What a crap article.

[Tax-chick]

Maybe one of the teenaged girls was the baby-mama.

[DoodleDawg]

Was young Mr. “Boo Boo” Niles in the car with the teenaged girls who were shooting at Mr. Scott’s house?

The way I read the article it appears he was not. Scott shot at the car that was threatening him and hit the other car, killing Niles. Now, did the bullet go through the car full of people threatening him and then hit Niles? In that case I could see him not being charged. It was just unfortunate that the bullet didn't hit one of the perpetrators first.

[harpu]

Here's the "rest of the story!"

[newnhdad]

I read that article three times and still have no idea what occurred other than some guy got shot.

[Tax-chick]

Okay, fact gained. Mr. Niles was not in the car with the girls.

[backwoods-engineer]

unintentionally hit unarmed 17-year-old Darrell Andre Niles in his car, killing him.

Stupid Brits. Do they not realize that if the other teenagers in the car were committing a crime at the time of Trayvon's Darrell's death, they would be charged with his murder, as if they'd killed him themselves.

"Stand Your Ground" is only one law that protects citizens in this country who are not the aggressors and not the criminals in a deadly force situation. It is only controversial to people who wish only the police had guns. That was tried once: Communism. Its outcome was predictable.

[jocon307]

“This article is garbled even by Daily Mail standards.”

Yes, it’s a complete mess. I have no idea what happened, but I see from the photos that all involved were black, so it must be Bush’s fault.

[SIDENET]

Yeah, I re-read the article and got that, too.

I scanned other articles about this story, and some of them tried to transform the shooter into a "white guy", so they could make it a race issue.

[PapaBear3625]

The shooter:

Don't think Al and Jesse will be showing up for this incident.

[Tax-chick]

The writer at the link in post 11 claims this man could be white, or have associations with “white privilege.”

We live in Bizarro World.

[Tupelo]

I know I will get flamed for this but;
I disagree with the decision to not try Shannon Anthony Scott.
When you shoot at anything or anyone, you should damn well know where that round could end up. EVEN A RICOCHET! From this story, we do not know the weapon Scott fired, so we cannot tell if the round could have penetrated the car he was shooting at or if he missed the car completely and killed the poor unfortunate teen.
Regardless of his background or family status, Darrell Andre Niles was NOT doing anything wrong when he was killed.
I say try Scott in a court of law. Let a jury decide.

[Vigilanteman]

I would tend to agree if Niles was not part of the thug car, which he evidently was not.

This article is awfully short of facts and awfully long on hyperbole!