The quotes suggest an odd lack of understanding of Roman warfare.
Some of the artifacts are so well preserved that the scientists can already retrace some of the battle lines.
Posted on 05/13/2013 6:09:08 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Some of the artifacts are so well preserved that the scientists can already retrace some of the battle lines.
|
|
|
| GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
|
|
The red dot on the map shows the location. |
|
|
|
|
The consequences of the Varian disaster have been terribly exaggerated in the past 150-200 years to serve German nationalism.
http://www.google.com/search?q=teutoburg%20monument
lotta good thats done them
You must be thinking about the blade Narsil.
When you consider the loses the Romans just shrugged off during the 1st and 2nd Punic Wars, losing 2 or 3 legions does kind of pale in comparison.
Thanks, I’ll try that. I need a soundtrack at work, and music is sometimes distracting, or the dynamics rise and fall too much to be convenient.
send link to Joe
This vexes me. I am very vexed.
niiiice sitting there at work with some fantasy playing in your head
The Roman force was on the move with all its baggage and households (and camp followers), which is weird behavior. Perhaps the objective was to winter over in a less remote or more defensible location.
The adversary Arminius was from the Roman auxiliaries and had served Rome, but turned coat. He understood his enemy very well, and of course it was a surprise attack.
The punitive expedition to hunt him down along with his followers ran into an ambush, but discipline and formation held; Arminius thought he was on the verge of a second great victory (and massacre), and shouted taunts at the Roman commander. He wound up having to flee for his life, and his forces were either slaughtered or scattered.
A few years later, in hiding deep in barbarian territory, he was murdered by members of his own family, probably at the behest of Rome, and for cash.
Meanwhile, the Romans reoccupied the lost territory — it was hardly “The Battle That Stopped Rome” as the recent-years book claims. The modern understanding of the full extent of Roman occupation has continually been expanded to the east and north, during the postwar period, likely as a result of the changing needs of modern politics.
Heh, the same kind of use has been made of Boudicca by the UK — she was a bloodthirsty, mass-murdering nutjob who led 70,000 Celts from dozens of British tribes into an abatoir, and yet is held up as an anachronistic nationalist hero. Ridiculous.
France, under Napoleon III, conducted an investigation of one of the purported sites of the massive Battle of Alesia, which was the huge, final defeat for the Gallic tribes under Vercingetorix — but again, used as an anachronistic nationalist symbol.
WWII was made possible by the relative low losses of German soldiery in WWI. Had their losses in WWI been anything like is *still* churned out of British textbooks, Germany would never have been able to start, much less sustain, WWII.
Okay, yeah, that paragraph only makes sense in my overall milieu.
They lied to me in Germania. If they lie to me, they don’t respect me.
Thanks for that link!
Canal of Drusus:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1181760/posts?page=3#3
gee i wonder how it wouldve turned out if some 6th century goat screwing pedophile claimed to be a prophet from god...
How dare you show your back to me! Slave, you will remove your helmet and tell me who you are!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
