Skip to comments.
How Nature refused to re-examine the 1989 CalTech experiment
LENR-CANR.org ^
| May 2012
| Jed Rothwell
Posted on 03/24/2013 9:57:16 PM PDT by Kevmo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
03/24/2013 9:57:16 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..
2
posted on
03/24/2013 9:58:17 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: Kevmo
3
posted on
03/24/2013 10:02:12 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Kevmo
This is the closest I’m going to get to the un-metered electricity I was promised in the 50’s.
4
posted on
03/24/2013 10:06:04 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Kevmo
P&F advocated open systems for calorimetry, which opens one up to evaporation. If the water evaporates away (or is electrolyzed away) then the thermal mass reduces, and a watt of heat would produce more temperature rise at the end of the experiment than at the beginning. This may not apply to Lewis’s system, but then again it might. It certainly applies to some of the P&F systems, because they advocated open systems.
5
posted on
03/24/2013 10:16:14 PM PDT
by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: Kevmo
still waiting to see all those promised units working and producing.....what’s the current time frame???? (other than before the twelfth of never)
6
posted on
03/24/2013 10:43:28 PM PDT
by
Nifster
To: Paladin2
I agree. Too cheap to meter. But the ability to meter things has grown greatly in the meantime.
7
posted on
03/24/2013 11:10:03 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: coloradan
I will have to check on that. In the meantime, it seems very unlikely that 2 of the most prominent elecrochemists would have made mistakes that are basically 4 orders of magnitude incorrect. Have you ever heard of such a thing? I haven’t. When I was in engineering school, if you were off by 1 order of magnitude, you were wrong. It’s not quite believable that distinguished scientists would be off by 4 orders of magnitude. How do you account for that? How do you account for the fact that this effect has been replicated more than 14,000 times? If they were so far off by 4 orders of magnitude, surely it would have NEVER been replicated.
8
posted on
03/24/2013 11:15:32 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: Nifster
..whats the current time frame???? (other than before the twelfth of never)
***The current time frame is about 200 years before the hot fusion boys ever produce something useful to engineering, and at about 1/1000th the cost.
9
posted on
03/24/2013 11:17:27 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: coloradan
"P&F advocated open systems for calorimetry, which opens one up to evaporation. If the water evaporates away (or is electrolyzed away) then the thermal mass reduces, and a watt of heat would produce more temperature rise at the end of the experiment than at the beginning." The P & F cells were re-filled daily. Your criticism thus does not apply. Other researchers replicated the P & F results with open cells, though not CalTech, MIT, and Harwell.
To: Nifster
Silly Nifster. Didn’t you see that the experiements have been repeated 14,000 times, obviously producing 1.21Gigawatts. Flux capacitor to follow shortly.
11
posted on
03/25/2013 4:44:52 AM PDT
by
fuente
To: fuente
"Didnt you see that the experiements have been repeated 14,000 times, obviously producing 1.21Gigawatts. Flux capacitor to follow shortly." Read Beaudette's book yet, cigar-boy??
To: Kevmo
I agree. Too cheap to meter. In the case of cold fusion, it's too miniscule and inconsistent to meter, or use to power anything.
13
posted on
03/25/2013 5:26:21 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Kevmo
***The current time frame is about 200 years before the hot fusion boys ever produce something useful to engineering, and at about 1/1000th the cost. Hot fusion produces something very useful to engineering and national defense. There is no doubt that it is theoretically sound, and actually exists, unlike cold fusion.
14
posted on
03/25/2013 5:29:54 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Wonder Warthog
Read Beaudette's book yet, cigar-boy?? Telling people to buy a book and calling names. You're really weak.
15
posted on
03/25/2013 5:31:52 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Nifster
I’m still waiting to get my nuclear powered vacuum cleaner that Alexander Lewyt promised back in the 60’s.
16
posted on
03/25/2013 6:04:54 AM PDT
by
ladyjane
(For the first time in my life I am not proud of my country.)
To: Kevmo
How do you account for the fact that this effect has been replicated more than 14,000 times? Always funny.
17
posted on
03/25/2013 8:02:51 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Moonman62
18
posted on
03/25/2013 8:04:42 AM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: Moonman62
19
posted on
03/25/2013 8:05:05 AM PDT
by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
To: Moonman62
Trolls, troublemakers, disruptors, forum pests, malcontents, RINOs, liberals, stalkers, et al, would continue posting to (harassing) someone after being asked to stop. Conservative FReepers would not. DO NOT POST TO ME! (5)
For you lurkers, you can get Beaudette's book (temporarily) free of charge through interlibrary loan. Or you can read excerpts from it on-line (and for free) at Steve Krivits "New Energy Times":
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/books/excessheat/AboutEH.shtml
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson