Posted on 11/09/2012 6:58:13 PM PST by oneprolifewoman
I would give up USSA citizenship immediately and become a Texan.
Louisiana has done this as well. You can find their petition on the same website.
And all conservative women should learn how to use firearms too. Many a granny has taken out some feral thug.
I am more concerned about my signature and personal info on a petition posted at the whitehut.gov site being forwarded to the new Dept. of Revenge
That's particularly true for Texas. The independent Republic of Texas joined the union by executing a treaty with the US. It was the only state to join in such a manner. The treaty stipulates that Texas can leave the union any time it wants to. Permission is not necessary.
I’m ready.
“Texas is big, but not big enough to hold all of us who would move there if it did secede.”
Want to bet? If the population of the world lived in Texas, roughly 7 billion people, each person would have approximately 1/3 of an acre.
No land would be left for agriculture or business, but the point is everybody alive would fit in that state, while the rest of the planet would be empty.
“You left out Tennessee. We are a conservative red state.”
What will Tennessee do with its super-majority? Enhance its RINOness or move further right?
My folks, sister and brother-in-law are there already. Would just need to find a job.
Think East Germany versus West Germany, North Korea versus South Korea.
What is never?
***************
A person meets the requirements of residence if they were living in Texas at the time of secession or have met the requirements of naturalization.
A person meets the requirements of ownership if they own a residence of at least 1000 square feet with plumbing and electrical utilities constituting a kitchen and bathroom OR if a person owns at least one acre of land OR owns a business that pays taxes equal to or greater than 10% of the average tax bill for all businesses in the state.
A person meets the requirements of employment if they have received in payment for services rendered or goods received an amount greater than 10% of the average income for the previous year. A person does not meet the requirements of employment if their sole source of income is a salary issued by a government agency.
A person meets the standard of self sufficiency if they have not, for five years prior to the day the ballot has been cast, received payment from the government except as a refund for overpayment. This includes any government guaranteed loan.
A person meets the standard of tax payment if they have remitted to taxing authorities an amount equal to 10% of the average of all tax payments.
Fraudulently casting a ballot when these requirements have not been met constitutes an act of treason against the state. Attempting to aid another person circumvent these requirements through fraudulent means constitutes an act of treason.
As one who currently lives in a RED Fla. county too.
Great post. Alaska would also secede. Plus some states that voted blue would break-up because they are rurally conservative ruled by liberal cities. Example Illinois- SW Illinois would break away from Chi-town, Eastern Washington would break away from Seattle and even Eastern CA, the bread basket of Ca, might break away, too many illegal immigrants put a doubt on it but.... Rural Nevada though not very polulated may want to divorce from Vegas. Va could break up with Southern and Western Va seceding, from Northern Va. The current state lines may disintegrate in such areas if secession become an option with the conservatives parts exiting.
Some things I think would need to be clearly & simply spelled out:
We should distrust the "Republic of Texas" as did the founders of any central government. A Republic of Texas would have the same pressures to extend its power and influence over the people as any other government in the history of the world. All should flow from the basic premise that God has given men certain unalienable rights. Man, inherent from his Creator, has certain unalienable rights and power including life, liberty and the peaceful pursuit of his own happiness. The Republic of Texas has no inherent rights or powers except those delegated it by the People of Texas. The Republic of Texas is LIMITED by those powers ENUMERATED in the Texas Constitution, DELEGATED to it by the people.
What will be the main decentralization units (maybe the Counties)? Then, the powers not delegated to the Republic of Texas by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to [the Counties] are reserved to the [Counties], respectively, or to the people. (Revised 10th Amendment.)
Repetition is not a bad thing, but necessary, in law because courts tend to construe law for their own purposes. It should be therefore, be plainly expressed that the "Bill of Rights" is not an enumeration of rights to the [Counties] and people. Those powers which are NOT in the Bill of Rights remain reserved for the [Counties] respectively, or to the people, unless otherwise delegated to Texas by the Constitution or prohibited by it to the [Counties].
Another problem with having an extensive Bill of Rights is enforcement by the Government. This is how the Communist countries operate and is counterproductive. The purpose of a Bill of Rights should be to simply clarify certain details as a proscription against the Government of Texas, NOT as an excuse for Texas to enforce every perceived violation among the [Counties] or people. Each [County] should have its own rules of government as the people of the [Counties] choose. The only thing the Government of Texas should have to power to do is DEFEND its citizens from attack from a foreign nation or, mostly in the courts rather than legislatively, from interference of an individuals life, liberty, or peaceful pursuits by another.
I would outlaw the income tax because it allows the government to use the tax for social engineering (even within the "progressive" prohibition) and way too much intrusiveness into peoples personal lives and also allows an oppressive enforcement regime (the U.S. IRS, for example) counter to a free society. A flat Retail Sales Tax would inherently be much less intrusive and simpler and have fewer drawbacks. One drawback to watch out for however would be government attempts to fix or otherwise monkey around with prices to try to maximize their revenues. Texas would need to be prohibited from ALL ECONOMIC ENGAGEMENT EXCEPT to settle SPECIFIC DISPUTES between [counties].
Except for Freddie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhjPvMpEhm4
In free societies, people are thought of as a good thing. In oppressive socialist and Marxist societies, people are looked at with suspicion and are considered a drain to the "entitlement" regime. In a free society, the more people the better, because they have to make their own way, are responsible for their own decisions and in so doing become productive members of society. If not, only they are the losers. Overall, a benevolent, free society is the best place to live on earth.
One of our biggest problems would be to counter the "intellectual elites" and "progressives" who would want to undermine the efforts to make Texas a benevolent and free society.
www.freetexasconstitution.wordpress.com
” - - - - I would love to see OK join TX in secession. - - - “
“I wasn’t born in TEXAS, but I got here as quick as I could.”
BTW, at the present rate of grown of Obamanation Communism in the former USA, Secession might, could, come about “Sooner” than the flick of a lamb’s tail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.