Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could someone tell Mark Levin, not to be Debbie Downer.
8/29/12

Posted on 08/29/2012 4:54:52 PM PDT by DallasBiff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last
To: svcw

” Stating the truth is not whining. “

Yep !


61 posted on 08/29/2012 6:36:59 PM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Put up Ronald Reagan as a candidate again, with the tea party behind him and a conservative media on radio and internet, we don’t know how far right his agenda would be, but it would be far to the right of where he was in 1979, the year that Mitt left the GOP.


62 posted on 08/29/2012 6:38:53 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Elendur
and WHO supports letting homosexuals be boy scout LEADERS... and be alone and in close contact with boys?

And has Romney supported that by government fiat, the answer is no.

Anyway I was there at 6:00 AM on August 1, 2012 at Chick Fil A, to buy 4 chicken biscuits, just to put in the nose of the queer mafia.

63 posted on 08/29/2012 6:45:51 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Elendur; DallasBiff

The “Romney-is-severely-conservative” people are the one who have been non-stop calling for Todd Akin to drop out. Apparently we’re supposed to turn a blind eye to Romney’s many shortcomings. The same standards don’t apply for Akin. He is unashamedly pro-life and that is a no-no for these people.


64 posted on 08/29/2012 6:47:12 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

GOP radio would have loved Reagan in 1980 and 1984, like we all did, where do you guys come up with this nonsense, is it a method of saying something else, a way to insult the Reagan conservatives that don’t approve of the leftward instincts of the current nominee?


65 posted on 08/29/2012 6:49:38 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Romney is radical for the homosexual agenda.


66 posted on 08/29/2012 6:51:10 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

I didn’t know the GOP had talk radio?


67 posted on 08/29/2012 6:52:29 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Moorings
You use language like "Puritanical Reaganite", and then tell us that you're tired of ideological wars. That is LOL funny.

Were you even born before 1980?

I was in my mid-teens and terrified about another Carter presidency.

John Anderson was considered a major threat to Reagan.

When the Reagan landslide happened, it was a big surprise.

68 posted on 08/29/2012 6:53:12 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff; Jim Robinson
Sadly, Jim, he(dallasbiff) is -- in the current manifestation of that terribly broken party, that is.

Why did you substitute your name, when I clearly meant Romney?

Furthermore, why is it assumed that I would favor Obama simply by observing that the Republican party is broken? Is it forbidden to even notice problems in the Republican party, lest you be labeled an Obama supporter? Is this the Republican form of Politically Correct speech and the censorship of nonconforming viewpoints we see extant in the liberal worldview?

69 posted on 08/29/2012 6:53:31 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Communist Party = Democrats. Socialist Party = Republicans. WE NEED A CAPITALIST FREEDOM PARTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz
Don’t be afraid to see what you see.

-Ronald Reagan
71 posted on 08/29/2012 6:59:38 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
I just get tired of the idelogical wars. Saw 2016 this weekend, and saw the real threat, Obama.

That is why Mark Levin - and I - ask why the Romney cabal has "toned down" criticism of Obama and practically banished the invocation of his name last night.

72 posted on 08/29/2012 7:01:12 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Reagan was pro-life when he signed that bill for the health of the mother in 1967, although we didn’t have language like pro-life, and pro-choice yet and most of us weren’t sure what it was all about, back then we were told that it was merely, a “unviable tissue mass”.

Reagan was sucker punched, and it tormented him, Mitt Romney was already for abortion at the time, and remained so, this week he said he wants abortion for the “health” of the mother.


73 posted on 08/29/2012 7:01:38 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Don’t be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan

Wonderful quote, and I'm not afraid.

Nor will I be browbeaten with the Obama-Fan stick simply for making correct observations.

It is as if I was in college, and if I observed that one plus one equals two, the professor screamed, "You hate calculus!"

74 posted on 08/29/2012 7:02:41 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Communist Party = Democrats. Socialist Party = Republicans. WE NEED A CAPITALIST FREEDOM PARTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Your beloved Romney said Reagan signing a law that made provision for the health of the mother makes him pro-choice. But now Romney comes out and says his abortion position is now exactly the same. But he claims that makes him pro-life. What gives?

Which lie is he telling now? Reagan had no idea the dems would twist the health of the mother to mean abortions for morning sickness and any other thing imaginable. He also regretted what had happened with all his heart.

With the benefit of 40+ years of experience, Romney, on the other hand, knew full well that the health of the mother is the dems trick to get all abortion covered and now believes he should be considered pro-life. Even though he never shed one tear or expressed any regret for the laws, and the appointees he is responsible for that lead to the murder of children. To this very day, he sings the praises of his fifty dollar or free abortion Romneycare and contrary to some of his prior statements, his own sister says he is still pro-choice.

Reagan went from caring enough about the mothers to fall for the democrats ruse to standing up for the children. Romney went from caring nothing about the babies to caring only about getting elected. Big change there, eh.


75 posted on 08/29/2012 7:03:54 PM PDT by Waryone (Definition of idiocy: nominating the father of socialized medicine to replace socialized medicine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Is it forbidden to even notice problems in the Republican party, lest you be labeled an Obama supporter?

No, but the problem is, is you don't differentiate, which is more broken the democrats or the republicans.

76 posted on 08/29/2012 7:04:24 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

So what? I am commenting on the contradictions in your statements.


77 posted on 08/29/2012 7:04:42 PM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: DallasBiff
No, but the problem is, is you don't differentiate, which is more broken the democrats or the republicans.

Nossir. I do not need to differentiate. I can simply state the very obvious and compelling fact, that the Republican party is truly broken.

To simplify it, let us say I was a prosecutor, and I was prosecuting a rapist. Would I need to show that the rapist was less guilty than a murderer, or that the rapist was more guilty than a shoplifter?

No. I would not.

79 posted on 08/29/2012 7:13:25 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Communist Party = Democrats. Socialist Party = Republicans. WE NEED A CAPITALIST FREEDOM PARTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The simple fact is that the GOP has a very serious problem when our nominees tend to be the very last choice of most of the voters


80 posted on 08/29/2012 7:17:18 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson