It goes without saying that popular culture today, including the closet-industry of self-certifying professional stunt fencers whose job it is to fake fights for movies and television, have no real clue as to what actual bladed combat was really like. I had a feeling that movie swordfighting was way too "gentlemanly."
1 posted on
08/23/2012 9:52:07 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: PJ-Comix
Talking to civil war re-enactors they say that swords used during the Civil War were merely for bludgeoning or slashing your adversary. Not much of the stabbing/if any was used. Took too long and in the heat of battle you didn't have a whole lot of time. You just swung and slashed.
Makes sense to me.
63 posted on
08/24/2012 6:03:37 AM PDT by
Northern Yankee
(Where Liberty dwells, there is my Country. - Benjamin Franklin)
To: All
One of the interesting aspects of medievel swordfighting is you did want necessarily want to kill your opponent if he was a high value target. The goal was to get the opponent to surrender, take him hostage, and get a large ransom.
69 posted on
08/24/2012 7:25:03 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: Swordmaker
I’m surprised you haven’t been pinged to this yet. Comments?
72 posted on
08/24/2012 9:13:00 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson