No, you are incorrect. Anyone with the following record is not just a liberal, they're a Progressive Liberal, and in Mitt Romney's case, a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal:
Posted on 08/03/2012 11:03:19 PM PDT by MacMattico
Good work and good luck with the car. When you have to worry about your car, this shows us the scum we have to fight against
No, I provided you with the DADT example and directed you to Romney’s record which is chock full of more liberal positions than Clinton ever signed off on. I gave you the opinion of arch liberal George Soros who stated his acceptance of Romney as a candidate. Those are indeed facts. If you want to be taken seriously, stop denying things like Romney’s liberalism and his historical record. Asking for facts, getting them and then complaining that they aren’t good enough may soothe the ache in your conscience over abandoning what you claim to believe in just to elect a liberal, but that’s all it does. Because it sure does not change the facts on the ground.
Fairly soon I think the ABOs are going to resort to some version of “Bush Lied/Kids Died” chants and a darker shade of rose in their glasses to try blocking out the truth of Mitt Romney. If people want to go through life having willingly empowered him to do what we all know he will, then so be it. Your vote and your right to exercise it as you see fit.
But PLEASE don’t try to BS the rest of us into believing he is something he’s not to hide your shame. We aren’t liberals and we don’t buy it.
Ditter to Kevmo
I get it, you don’t like RINO’s but how does giving up your vote against obozo
***Where have I GIVEN UP my vote against Obozo? If I vote for Hannah Montana I’m still voting AGAINST 0bozo.
do our country any good?
***Recall my experience with Mr. Huffington, it was RINOs that did more damage than democrats. I voted properly and honorably as a conservative. It is the republicans who are currently ashamed of their previous votes and the current situation they put all of us in.
He is a communist muslim, with those 2 things rolled up into his American hating soul, it doesn’t not get any worse.
***Then go and convert some 0bots into Mittbots rather than risk stirring up any more discord among conservatives. All of us see that this is the right thing to be doing.
I’m glad to see you do not dispute that it was RINOs that did more damage to conservatism than democrats.
But I do NOT think that RINO’s do more damage to conservatism than democrats. MORE damage? Give me a break! Barack Insane Obama has done more damage than any president we have ever had, even more that Carter (hoped I'd never have to say that)! If we don't boot him out in Nov. we are lost and you are whining about electing a RINO! Good God the world has gone crazy!
I know nothing about politics in your state other than it is a liberal hell hole with nice weather and earthquakes.
***Then you admit it: you do not know. You don’t know what the freep you are talking about. You proceed from that ignorance with your admittedly ill-informed opinion.
But I do NOT think
***Your admittedly ill-informed opinion is basically worthless at this point.
that RINO’s do more damage to conservatism than democrats.
***What a crock of shiite. You proceed from your own admitted ignorance in the face of a publicly confirmable set of facts in the Huffington fiasco, and you tell us what you don’t think. If you were a conservative, you’d think a little bit more clearly.
MORE damage?
***Yes. Absolutely, freeping 100% yes. Contrary to your admittedly ill-informed OPINION.
Give me a break!
***Maybe you will deserve a break when you inform yourself.
Barack Insane Obama has done more damage than any president we have ever had, even more that Carter (hoped I’d never have to say that)!
***Then look what happened after Carter: Reagan.
If we don’t boot him out in Nov. we are lost
***Pure, 100% ill-informed conjecture.
and you are whining about electing a RINO!
***Who TF are you to come onto a conservative website and try to convince conservatives to betray their conservative principles to vote for a freeping librul who has a TruthFile on the front page? You aint no conservative.
Good God the world has gone crazy!
***You are absofreepinglutely correct. The front page of this website talks about what Conservatism means, and it also includes a RomneyTruthFile about the CINO you’re trying to get us to vote for, whom the owner of this website will not vote for. Free Republic is NOT a republican website. It is a conservative website. What you are doing is NOT conservative. You deserve a freeping zot.
My goodness you have certainly gotten upset. Sorry I did that to you but I read your homepage where you said you were “a big tent republican”. Maybe you are not.
I read your homepage where you said you were “a big tent republican”.
***You seem to have reading comprehension problems. __________________________________________________________________
I’m a big tent republican.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1821435/posts?page=18455
Here’s an analogy to work with. Take a small box and fill it with some rocks. Then add some rice, filling it to the top. Now take all the same stuff, but in a different order. Put in the rice first, then add the rocks. What you’ll find is that if you put in the big stuff first, the small stuff will fit around it. But if you put in the small stuff first, the big stuff won’t have room. The republican tent is the box. The Big issues are the socon issues, to be put in first. The little issues are things that can be accommodated around the bigger stuff. A candidate who tries to focus on the smaller issues first and leave out the bigger issues has no way of getting all of us into the tent. He splits the party. The candidate who gets the big stuff right and as much of the little stuff that will fit, he can fit more into the tent. We’re often amazed at how much rice can keep fitting in. Folks such as Rudy or Romney flunk some of the big issues, and on some of the little issues it looks to me like anyone else’s rice would do just as well. All that remains for us to agree on is which are the bedrock principles and which are not. Why would there be so much invective aimed at rudy or romney from the right? Because there are some bedrock principles that he is leaving out. Bad move. I see rudybot and romneybot postings all the time saying that they would vote for Hunter or Palin, and I see socon postings that say they would not vote for rudy or romney. That’s a BIG indicator of a few bedrock principles that are being left outside the tent in order to let in some rice.
___________________________________________________________________
Are you a conservative? Why are you logging onto this conservative website trying to separate conservatives from their conservative beliefs? That is NOT conservative.
Yes I have been conservative all my life.
as my daddy used to say “you can wish in one hand and sh*t in the other and see which one gets full first”.
***Is that some way to convince conservatives to vote for a librul?
as my daddy used to say “you can wish in one hand and sh*t in the other and see which one gets full first”.
***Maybe you can post that to JimRob as the convincing evidence that gets him to vote for this lying, baby-killing statist. He has authority, I don’t. So, go ahead and post it to him or are you a bootlicker?
The “sh*t” comment is a joke, a very VERY old joke. You need to lighten up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.