Skip to comments.
(Vavavooom!) 600-year-old bra and underwear discovered in an Austrian castle
IO9 ^
| Jul 18, 2012
| Annalee Newitz
Posted on 07/20/2012 10:24:09 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
![Sexy skellie](http://i1069.photobucket.com/albums/u479/RickReiss6/SK031.jpg)
The perfect lady for this 600-year-old lingerie ...
To: DogByte6RER
2
posted on
07/20/2012 10:25:09 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(FUJR (not you, Jim))
To: dfwgator
... I wonder what the panties smell like?
3
posted on
07/20/2012 10:29:43 PM PDT
by
Ken522
To: dfwgator
Those panties are kinda hot..
![EM 4033 Pictures, Images and Photos](http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g338/DannyS1229/Elegant%20Moments%20Lingerie/1490200d.jpg)
Just to keep this thread on topic ...
5
posted on
07/20/2012 10:31:12 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER; dfwgator; Lazamataz
The EPD’s for milk production were not yet developed but an association with progeny growth and mammaries was empirically recognized and valued.
The rest is Western Civilization History..
6
posted on
07/20/2012 10:31:51 PM PDT
by
One Name
(Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
To: SunkenCiv
7
posted on
07/20/2012 10:32:45 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
Das nennt man die Wunderbar Wunderbra, Ja!
8
posted on
07/20/2012 10:33:38 PM PDT
by
bunkerhill7
(Under der linden??? . what??? Who knew? .)
To: bunkerhill7
Ja...she haf der kleinen sitzen und der grossen titzen.
9
posted on
07/20/2012 10:34:34 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(FUJR (not you, Jim))
To: All
![Raquel Welch Pictures, Images and Photos](http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h9/Sheydj/welch_01.jpg)
I've seen these garments before ...
10
posted on
07/20/2012 10:39:01 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
11
posted on
07/20/2012 10:41:33 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(FUJR (not you, Jim))
To: DogByte6RER
My wife has a set looks about like that.
12
posted on
07/20/2012 10:43:22 PM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We deserve the government we allow.)
To: DogByte6RER
That lab picture reminds me of something out of an old Woody Allen movie, "Sleeper," as if they're checking the cell structure of the bra in order to clone the girl back into the bra.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qdB0g3cCSA
13
posted on
07/20/2012 10:43:48 PM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: DogByte6RER
I’m trying to follow the logic in the article. The discovery of bras told them that the Middle Ages were more liberal than the 18th and 19th centuries. How do they know these bras were indicative of anything? Maybe they were the only ones. Who knows? I suspect underwear was primitive. Period.
14
posted on
07/20/2012 10:50:32 PM PDT
by
brytlea
(An ounce of chocolate is worth a pound of cure)
To: DogByte6RER
No panties, huh? Well, that settles it, if we ever develop time travel, I’m jumping back to the “First Bra Age”.
15
posted on
07/20/2012 10:51:57 PM PDT
by
arderkrag
(ABOs are Romneybot trolls. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: brytlea
well, having studied history, I may be able to help here. Follow if you can: It’s the medieval era. You are a woman and live in a castle. You share rooms with other people, some you may not be related to. You bathe and change clothes (when you do) in front of these other people. You wear a bra for these events but no panties. This is less liberal sexually than the Greeks and Romans (who let it all hang out regularly and had sex in the common rooms of their houses with other people around, probably all through their rise and fall) but more liberal sexually than the corset-wearing bodice ripping renaissance when lingerie was developed and women only bathed and dressed in front of other women - many times only close relatives, who probably don’t share your room.
16
posted on
07/20/2012 11:00:50 PM PDT
by
arderkrag
(ABOs are Romneybot trolls. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: DogByte6RER
![](http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1848/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1848-42930.jpg)
You can`t miss the castle.
17
posted on
07/20/2012 11:02:27 PM PDT
by
bunkerhill7
(??? . what??? Who knew? .)
To: AD from SpringBay
They look curiously modern, don’t they?
Also, how do they know those are men’s underpants and not women’s underpants?
That garment apparently has seen better days. Look at all the mending.
To: All
![Helen Thomas Pictures, Images and Photos](http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm219/killro/ahhhhwtf.jpg)
"600-year-old bra and underwear discovered in an Austrian castle" ... on 600-year-old corpse journalist (This is her sexy boudoir photo) - My last post on this topic ... I promise
19
posted on
07/20/2012 11:03:59 PM PDT
by
DogByte6RER
("Loose lips sink ships")
To: DogByte6RER
600 years ago some guy got lucky.
And hid the evidence from his wife very well.
20
posted on
07/20/2012 11:09:18 PM PDT
by
ElPaseo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson