Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/01/2012 8:42:04 PM PDT by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: teg_76

Levin endorses Mittens now, so does Newt and Sarah.

Now what?


67 posted on 05/01/2012 10:12:41 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

Not Limbaugh. Not Levine. Hannity is a slug, dont listen anymore.
I think you are just over thinking it.


68 posted on 05/01/2012 10:15:43 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

Just look at Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Beck, Medved, Hewitt, Prager, Miller, Gibson, Levin, Ingraham, Boortz, Bennett, Liddy, Bruce, Elder, Hedgecock, Gallager, Larsen, Humphries, Kilmeade, Sciff, Parshall, Doyle, Sullivan, Carr, Quinn and Rose, Belling, Davis, Thompson, Pagliarulo, Garrison, Mancow, McConnell, Crowley, Grant, Redding, Cosby, Schlafly, Loesch, Sliwa, Dr. Albrecht, Erickson, Giordano, Sekulow, Severin, Stock, Thomas, Slade, Lawson, Valentine, Peterson, Are, Parshall, Zoller, Manders, Mckay, Belfrage, Donahue, Reagan, Merlino, Carroll, Douglas, Rydell, and Siegel. All are oars in the conservative waters. Some are minor players who work to earn a modest living while putting out the good faith to those who care to listen. Some reach huge markets who become blowtorches for the message of conservativism. We are fortunate to have all of them.


73 posted on 05/01/2012 11:06:07 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76
Mark Levin,
^^^^^^^^

Mark Levin, the so called constitutional expert, is a sell out as well. His response to Obama’s trashing of Article 2, Section1? DEAFENING SILENCE!

Levin is the slime found in dirty toilet.

86 posted on 05/02/2012 3:09:33 AM PDT by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

Group think is not conservative.


89 posted on 05/02/2012 3:39:28 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

As long as we have the birther issue and the issue of impeaching Obama for his various actions not advocated by the likes of Hannity then one can not get a full picture of the monstrosity of what is going on in America today.

For these people to then have to carry Mitts’ water because there is no other alternative for them is also a sad commentary on America.

I’m with those who oppose Mitt and Obama like James David Manning and others. The question is if Mitt won, how long before they turn on him again like they did in 2009?

I like Rush, Levin and Beck though, but don’t always agree. Hannity not so much until he leaves fox. Because fox news has beef with some pet issues of conservatives and the memo is out now to follow the GOP talking points. It is why Beck left and Judge Napolitano lost his show and why Stossel lost his audience in the studio and his show is a bit dull now.

Only the F&F crew, Megyn Kelly and Cavuto are worth it for straight news reporting of the days news. Anything with opinion behind it on Fox News is not worth it. And Cavuto dishes opinion, but on the economy mostly and he is not pimping rinos. He lets all guests speak their minds.


90 posted on 05/02/2012 3:47:09 AM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76
Do you ever get the feeling that Rush and Hannity don't really care who wins

Nope!

92 posted on 05/02/2012 4:02:52 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (My 6 pack abs are now a full keg......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

Hannity is probably a yes. Rush used to be a lot worse than he is lately.


94 posted on 05/02/2012 4:14:02 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

Isn’t is a shame that there are no honest conservatives in the world today, except for a few posters at this site.


97 posted on 05/02/2012 4:21:43 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

As Bill Buckley was the “founder” of the New Conservatism, Rush was the “founder” of the New Genre, (radio, tv, blogs,etc)of Conservatism (over 23 yrs and still a force)


99 posted on 05/02/2012 6:52:14 AM PDT by capt B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

I don’t understand why so few here get this.. Rush, Hannity, et al are ENTERTAINERS, they aren’t political leaders. They are there to make themselves $$$ pure and simple and they do it by entertaining... its a gig, nothing more.

No one who’s cashflow is dependent on their audience is going to ruffle the feathers of their audience too badly, they’d be stupid to.

They have staked out the conservative as their audience, so they don’t care if they upset liberals, because they aren’t targeting them anyway, but if they endorce someone they wind up ticking off the part of their audience that likes the other guy. So why the hell would they do it?

Seriously folks, looking for anyone in talk radio for political leadership is beyond foolish. They are their to entertain and cash checks.


100 posted on 05/02/2012 7:00:11 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: teg_76

I don’t understand why so few here get this.. Rush, Hannity, et al are ENTERTAINERS, they aren’t political leaders. They are there to make themselves $$$ pure and simple and they do it by entertaining... its a gig, nothing more.

No one who’s cashflow is dependent on their audience is going to ruffle the feathers of their audience too badly, they’d be stupid to.

They have staked out the conservative as their audience, so they don’t care if they upset liberals, because they aren’t targeting them anyway, but if they endorce someone they wind up ticking off the part of their audience that likes the other guy. So why the hell would they do it?

Seriously folks, looking for anyone in talk radio for political leadership is beyond foolish. They are there to entertain and cash checks.


101 posted on 05/02/2012 7:00:27 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson