Posted on 03/20/2012 4:55:36 AM PDT by Renfield
bttt
we are neanderthals.
On the other hand it's a very well made observation.
The cold hard facts are the Neanderthals were working on becoming MODERN HUMANS as in Sapiens Sapiens more than 300,000 years ago. The current crowd who imagine themselves to be MODERN HUMANS started only 180,000 years ago.
That's a full Glacial Cycle ~ the kind of experience that imbeds itself in the genes. The more recent ability to outbreed our range does not really make us advanced ~ just more like bunny rabbits.
However, to be PC the writers didn't say any blacks at all had any Neanderthal genes ~ but you are clever to have noticed the difference. Remember, if the writer had said "blacks have Neanderthal genes" the NAACP and their running dog lackeys would be bouncing off the walls screaming "He used the N-word".
And objectively, if Neanderthals were smarter than modern Homo Sapiens, then why did they die out? Surely if they were smarter, they would have been able to outcompete us?
BTW, this is all new stuff. Recent advances in obtaining good DNA from old bones are making this possible.
One very busy neanderthal guy fertilized millions of homo sapien women.
However, brain size does matter even today. Let's say you are born without a brain ~ your life expectancy is going to be pretty short. Or, you could be like Joe Biden and have brain surgery 3 times, and you'll pay for even the slightest disturbances ~ and we can see that almost every day recently. Guy is deteriorating before our eyes.
The point of this article is that Neanderthals did not die out ~ they were absorbed into our current genome.
This stuff has been posted recently.
Once again, this is what Neanderthals looked like:
Image courtesy of www.themandus.org
There has never been any mixing of human stock and THAT and the people making such claims are suffering from a breakdown in basic logic.
There is terribly little genetic variation in the human race compared to all but one or two other mammals and that is due to some fairly recent genetic bottleneck which reduced the human population to a very small number of individuals, possibly less than fifty or a hundred.
If there ever had been any human/Neanderthal crossbreeding, it would have happened either before or after the bottleneck. I think even the logically impaired/challenged would have to agree to that...
If human/Neanderthal crossbreeding happened before the bottleneck, you'd not read these claims of whites and East Asians having Neanderthal genes but Africans not having it; we'd all have them. If any human group had mixed with Neanderthals AFTER that bottleneck, the variation between that group and all others (humans) would be gigantic.
The only conclusion which is tenable is that there has never been any mixing of humans and Neanderthals, and that any similar genes anybody finds are just artifacts of same or similar low-level components being used by an original designer or designers.
There is zero possibility of humans and apes interbreeding. Joseph Stalin's scientists tried to create a race of super workers by crossing apes and humans in the 1930s and none of the subjects even survived. Even the idiot commies recognized the project as a failure.
Maybe you could tell us why the greatest poet ever to write in any IndoEuropean language (Pushkin) was a man of color or how his great grandfather, a pure African kid given to Tsar Peter by the sultan of Turkey became a major minister in Tsar Peter's court, or how Scott Joplin became the greatest American composer of piano music, or how.....
Science and bullshit don't really mix well.
You might want to look at post 29 as well. The Neanderthal was a bipedal and 100% carniverous ice-age ape with an 8” fur coat and huge eyes for nocturnal hunting. The sum total of genetic content from Neanderthals in modern humans is zero.
A strange and disturbing reading.
Oh yeah?
There is a thing called a Distribution Curve. In any subgroup there are people at the right end of the curve, people in the middle, and people at the left end. The highest-IQ people of subgroup A are going to be smarter than the average person in subgroup B, even if the median IQ of subgroup B is more than the median for A.
The common assumption is that Neanderthals were stupid. Stupid people don't survive in cold climates. Mistakes are more likely to result in your death.
Mitochondrial DNA is passed directly from mother to child, with no contribution from the father's DNA. The DNA in the nucleus is half from the father, half from the mother. If no Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA is found, that indicates that any inter-racial mating involved Neanderthal men mating CroMag women (or at least, mating which resulted in surviving progeny).
So says Danny Vendramini, a writer with whose credentials are hard for me to find after a a bit of searching. A bio pages says "Australian born, Danny Vendramini had successful careers as a theater and film director and scriptwriter before turning to evolutionary biology".
Reconstructions by people with actual science backgrounds have Neanderthals looking not too different from us. Give one a shave, shower, and modern clothes and you would probably walk pass him on the street without thinking him that unusual.
The claim that they had the usual ice-age fur coats is consistent with the total lack of Neanderthal needles; creatures with fur coats don't need clothing or needles.
Vendramini's depiction of the huge nocturnal predator eyes is consistent with the huge Neanderthal eye sockets and the same is true of the Neanderthal nasal area. Attempts to draw a more human-like Neanderthal with eyes and noses the sizes they'd have to be look outlandish:
The basic reality is that the images you're used to seeing are artefacts of fiction.
If you have an 8" fur coat it's easier...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.