Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naming the Crime. If what Hitler did was genocide, what do we call what Stalin did?
National Review ^ | 03/18/2011 | Andrew Stutafford

Posted on 03/18/2011 7:33:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: SoConPubbie

But as one poster pointed out, once it passes a certain point, the numbers aren’t even comprehensible. No question, socialism in its various incarnations has been the single greatest cause of death in the history of mankind. And where it doesn’t kill, it always trails clouds of misery.

Anyone clinging to such a failed model must be pathologically misanthropic.


41 posted on 03/18/2011 10:03:14 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hflynn

Fraticide, Commicide & Obamacide


42 posted on 03/18/2011 10:03:49 AM PDT by STD (Love Your God, Love Your Neighbor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pecos

Social-Liberal heaven?


43 posted on 03/18/2011 10:22:03 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

More importantly, “In the mind of westerners, the people that matter are individuals. Few mourn people without names. There are just too many of them.”

America will go to war to save the lives of a few hostages, risking the death of dozens or hundreds to save individuals. But when we see a place like Pol Pot’s Cambodia, or the Rwandan genocide, while we abhor and deplore what happens, these are faceless, nameless people.

This isn’t racism. Were a handful of ethnic Cambodian or Rwandan Canadians taken hostage, and Americans were moved by their plight as individuals, we might very well risk our lives to save them. Because they had faces, and were individuals.


44 posted on 03/18/2011 12:17:25 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

In other words, where is the Ukrainian, “Anne Frank”?


45 posted on 03/18/2011 1:01:34 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Not the best example, since her book was first published in 1947, and only published in English in 1952.

Prior to the war, however, there had been lots of Jews living in the US, and they lobbied on behalf of Jews being persecuted in Europe, though to little effect. In the case of both them and the Armenians persecuted during their genocide, earlier, there had been some sympathetic Americans, but not enough to sway popular opinion.


46 posted on 03/18/2011 2:08:51 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson