Posted on 03/11/2011 10:38:44 AM PST by Pharmboy
Pinging you FR geniuses...
I know when I look at your stereotypical geniuses (Bill Gates, “Big Bang Theory,” “The Social Network,” etc.,), the first thing I think is: Yup, we’re just too damned manly.
Infants in the uterus are remarkable things. Surgery done in the uterus doesn't leave a scar. It just leaves a little red mark the body because those little things heal so fast and so perfectly.
If this study is correct, the genius would show up more on the male side rather than the female side. It would take a lot more testosterone to damage the female brain. They have very little of their own to start with.
I disagree with their theory.
While hormones are part of the process, they are not the ultimate director of such processes.
The terms ‘genius’ and ‘very bright’ are not exactly measurable quantities, and not necessarily the same thing.
It is my belief, based on looking around me, that those who are tagged as ‘genius’, usually are deficient in other areas (mentally).
They either have a physical reason to focus (Steven Hawking) all their mental abilities into one channel, or they achieve focus in one area, by not using it in any other area (absent-minded professor, weirdo geek, etc)
Then there are those who are autistic. Very bright, highly non-functional in society. The cause is a toss up, but the methodology is the same. The mind concentrates it’s power in a limited area permanently, by abandoning others.
There are plenty of highly intelligent (say...based on MENSA scores) ‘normal’ people out there, who COULD be ‘geniuses’ if they focused all their attention to one thing, at the expense of the others. But, they don’t.
To conclude, Hormones may be an ingredient of the ‘cause’, but it is only one among many.
Score numbers mean nothing. Standard deviation and percentile are the metrics. This seems like an opportunity to burn research money and publish only. This demonstrates to me that these people don't have a clue.
I can answer this in the other direction. Sometimes when observing the effects of female hormones I get a little stupid.
Little known is that Einstein’s mom was the bearded lady in a circus.
I agree with your observations.
Great point...seriously.
HAHAHA...you and me both, friend...
Nice one...for this guy to try and ascribe something as complex and obviously multigenic as human intelligence to one factor is just plain...silly.
Indeed...but the power to concentrate and focus is undoubtedly (largely) genetic.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
I dunno...kick her in the shins?
To test how much exposure you had to testosterone in utero you can look at the length of your fingers (true for men, not sure for women). If the ring finger is longer than the index finger then you got a lot of testosterone. If the index finger is longer you were lacking. Strange but true.
That would create 'her moans', not hormones eh?
Thanks again...
That really does tie it together. My son (who has a long ring finger) got a perfect score on the English portion of his SAT and >700 on the math.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.