[pissant]

Not sure if its feminism or brainlessism, either way its pathetic.

[so_real]

Ignoring the fact that most of the top-level staffers in Obama’s former Senate office were male, she made this charge: “Out on the stump he talks a good game about equal pay for equal work, but according to the Senate payroll records, women on his own staff get just 83 cents for every dollar that the men get.”

One coin ... two sides. The article's author asserts the dominance of men in Obama's Senate office in top-level positions, and defends the subsequent pay differential that causes by gender. Sarah, viewing Obama's cabinet through the lens of her own experience, questions why the work would differ from cabinet member to cabinet member and stresses equal pay for equal work. I don't see a "win" for either point of view as they are arrived at through different assertions. Much ado about nothing ...

[Iron Munro]

"But the more I learn about Sarah Palin, the more I become perplexed....."

Do you know what perplexes me?

"No, what?"

YOU DO! You whining, sniveling, snot-nosed, liberal Jack-Wagon!

[Liberty Valance]

"...harsh feminist rhetoric"

Somebody got beat up by a girl. ;o)

[FreeAtlanta]

I will take her over Obama and any of the current GOP presidential wannabes, any day. Sarah has my vote.

[McGruff]

[jennychase]

Here is Carey Roberts and his picture -
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/roberts

[supremedoctrine]

While I don’t believe Sarah Palin is the Second Coming, I don’t believe anyone else on the horizon is either, and I don’t think we’re well-served to expect anyone to be.
This is a particularly amateurish piece, and I’m surprised the DAILY CALLER would ‘publish’ it, unless its in their blog area where they don’t exercise that kind of editorial control. Instead they put it out there and let people like pissant post it on FR.
Oddly enough, the charge of “sexism” he seems to think is part of Palin’s toolbox, DOES hold water when the blatant sexism at the core of her gender-buddies Nicole Wallace and Peggy Noonan is cited. These are women who’d rather be tied to the powerful males they’ve served than realistically assess the mad talents of one of their own gender, named SP.
And as far as Palin taking part in some inner machinations at NOW, that’s only to the good, if it helped bring that organization a little closer to 21st Century concerns, since NOW ain’t going away anytime soon, so it might as well
‘reform’.

[NormsRevenge]

Conformity Uber Alles? Capiche?

even the right-wing pundit army has its airheads.

[Retired Greyhound]

Sarah is old news.

Col. Allen West is the future.

[longtermmemmory]

Palin is an asset to rally the base, or at least a part of the base.

Whether or not she is worthy of being the standard bearer as the next nominee is very uncertain and fading.

[unseen1]

sit down, shut up get back in the kitchen... he explained...

[fanfan]

Sarah Palin needs to rein in her harsh feminist rhetoric

ROFLOL! Harsh feminist rhetoric? LOLOL!

[Grampa Dave]

What the reality of Sarah Palin does to liberals, maggot infected gays posing as journalists/writers, lesbians, abortion queens, and of course the kind and gentle Rinos:

[DouglasKC]

Has this *ever* been a major theme of Sarah Palin’s???

[FTJM]

How dare ANYONE criticize HER!