Posted on 01/25/2011 11:56:38 AM PST by nickcarraway
You are contrasting apples and oranges. Comparable cases would be other children left on buses, not children left in cars.
The common factor in both cases is criminal negligence of the adult responsible.
The bus driver’s failure to check the bus before parking it for the day is responsible for this incident.
You are assuming he did not attempt to do so.
It sounds like you were raised by parents who were concerned that you learn personal responsibility, initiative, and independence. Not all kids are so fortunate.
Young elementary school boys especially are often chastised for doing things that young elementary school boys do simply because they do not behave as well as the girls in their class. When a young boy constantly hears “Don’t touch this; don’t try that.” NEEDLESSLY from his teachers and other school authority figures, it re-enforces the lesson that climbing, exploring and figuring out how things work through trial and error are Bad Ideas.
It does not appear that you were in his place; you appear to have been better prepared for life and the world at his age than he seems to have been by his parents and authority figures.
The kid’s failures can be solved by education and discipline.
The bus driver’s failures are the more severe and should be dealt with more harshly.
Why are the two not comparable? Both involve a child left behind due to adult negligence.
The bus driver’s failure to check the bus before parking it for the day is responsible for this incident.
Of course. But this is one incident out of millions of kids who ride school buses every day, and this one incident does not justify any broad conclusions about "the incompetency of government officials," specifically school bus drivers, many of whom are parents working part-time for a little extra income.
Again you are forgetting that I know that this yard is a busy depot and maintenace yard with many workers and with constant in and out traffic. So it is more than just an assumption that he did not try to attract attention.
I agree with the rest.
Any adult responsible for children in a professional setting has it hammered into their heads that above all else they need to make sure that they have turned over all children in their care to another responsible adult (a teacher or parent, etc) before tending to other duties.
Since the government workers who run our schools like to flaunt their professionalism, they need to do what real professionals do when they have a problem-—make changes to prevent its reoccurrence.
This is not the first time that a child has been found on a school bus, nor will it be the last.
In Illinois, the school bus driver would have violated the law. I am not aware of any equivalent or similar laws in Florida, and personally would much rather that bus drivers and other people responsible for school children would use common sense rather than waiting for something to become law.
I acknowledged this above; however, even in a busy depot and maintenance yard, there are periods in the day when the activity around one particular bus may be nonexistent. If a child does not try for more than a few minutes to garner attention (and so many kids have such short attention spans that they will assume that calling for help/banging on windows/doing X is fruitless because it didn’t work within a few minutes), then there is less chance of that child being discovered.
Unless this story is updated, we don’t know how much, or for how long (if at all) this kid tried to attract attention before he gave up to find ways to entertain himself. It probably did not occur to this kid, until the hours stretched by, that any adult would be away for more than a few minutes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.