Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$2.5 Tr USD in CUTS: Full list of 2011 budget cuts... (GOP)
USN | 01/20/11 | Self

Posted on 01/20/2011 10:04:19 AM PST by NowApproachingMidnight

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: KansasGirl

hm..no mention of not funding HAMAS via aid to palestine ?


21 posted on 01/20/2011 10:25:03 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
-close all foreign bases not needed for current terrorist effort, i.e. many in Europe and South Korea.

720+ foreign installations was the last count I read...I'm sure they're all indispensable,too.

22 posted on 01/20/2011 10:25:26 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

Buncha RINOs. If they were REAL conservatives, they’d completely eliminate the federal government, and outsource it to private companies.


23 posted on 01/20/2011 10:27:42 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USSR Didnt Fall

Sen. Rand Paul to unveil budget proposal with $500B worth of cuts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2659098/posts

“Kentucky’s junior Republican senator... about to unveil his own sweeping budget plan that would result in a $500 billion cut in just one year — about five times more than what the House GOP has promised to do.”


24 posted on 01/20/2011 10:28:04 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aces
With a 1.4 trillion yearly deficit, 1.2 trillion over 10 years doesn't even get you off the starting line.

We are in big trouble if this is all the GOP is going to do. They are using a scalpel when they need to use a machete.

25 posted on 01/20/2011 10:28:36 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“The place to start is to freeze the debt ceiling.
THEN look at how much money MUST be cut.
THEN make a list of places to cut.”

These are the priorities, and in the correct order.
Mahalo for your analysis.


26 posted on 01/20/2011 10:29:09 AM PST by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight
The budget for the Dept of Health and Human Services for FY2011 is $910 BILLION. Note that they "only" spent $794 Billion is FY2009.

My proposals:
1. Return to FY2009 levels and freeze them. Saves $116 billion for 2012.
2. Fix a date - probably 2014 - for the states to take over all responsibility for HHS functions. Beginning in 2014, this $794 billion becomes $600 billion as budgeted and is distributed directly to the states... under the idea that the states can do things more cheaply and by eliminating the Washington superstructure. Saves another $194 billion.
3. Over the next 10 years, reduce that $600 billion by 10% per year and let each state figure what programs they wish to continue (and tax for) and which ones they wish to eliminate.

Total savings: $4.398 trillion over ten years 2012-2021 or $6.950 trillion by 2024 when the funding line is entirely eliminated... though these figures don't account for the inevitable escalation of federal budgets over time.

Until and unless we can actually get stuff like this out of Washington completely, there is going to be no true reform and no true savings. We must eliminate bureaucracy.... and HHS (in my opinion) is the biggest offender. I'm not suggesting that some of the programs they do aren't useful; but I want them out of Washington so that they can be controlled better by the people and so that the Constitution's requirements can be restored.

27 posted on 01/20/2011 10:34:35 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The place to start is to freeze the debt ceiling.

Yet, they're floating the idea of raising it for a worthless promise of a measly reduction in the deficit.

They need to refuse to raise the debt ceiling, then start investigations into Geithner and the rest of the criminals in the Ears regime to see if they have been illegally issuing debt in expectation of it being raised.

Wouldn't we all love to see that worthless punk Geithner spend a looooong time in a federal penitentiary? And maybe they could get Ears a nice permanent vacation at Club Fed.

28 posted on 01/20/2011 10:34:44 AM PST by MichiganConservative (Terrorists don't commit genocide. That's what governments do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stymee

The DOD too.

{When an agency loses BILLIONS of dollars [unaccountable-disappeared, not “oh, we used it in secret projects”] it’s time to put that agency down; if it’s truly a needful agency we can charter a replacement.}


29 posted on 01/20/2011 10:38:39 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I agree, we need the slash and burn sale, our lives and country depend on it...if this mentality does not catch on we are gone...

I am with you..say our national debt is 30 trillion total, probably more like 150 trillion, just start slashing government agencies, overseas bases, strip them of the ability to even raise money from us, let the states handle the budget and make it illegal for the fed to have funds to bail out foolish states, dirt roads are better than ones our childrens children can never pay for, all overseas spending gone, all federal taxes gone..prop up the manufacturing bases by the states.. etc until the big number is gone in 1 year...take the bitter pill now, and kick the butts of those politicians that won’t serve..


30 posted on 01/20/2011 10:39:55 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Yes - and we have a chance to get that done right now. Remember a decade+ ago when the GOP went out and claimed to have a balanced budget within (I think) 7 years? Then Bill Clinton shocked everybody by engaging in a game of 'one-upsmanship" with Congress and we actually ended up with a surplus. I say let's go for it and see if Obama doesn't want to play the same game to save any chance he might still have of maintaining his residence beyond 2012.
31 posted on 01/20/2011 10:39:55 AM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

Though it’s a good start it’s Not enough.They need to start. Chopping the Dept. Of energy,Dept. Of Education and cut them massively.They don’t produce so they need to be eliminated.


32 posted on 01/20/2011 10:40:26 AM PST by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight
Good start!

Now we need a minimum of another $13 trillion just to bring balance.

33 posted on 01/20/2011 10:40:50 AM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

We must have patience - this is a great start - the media and dems will howl.

Too much at one time will fail - I like this list.

More to come.


34 posted on 01/20/2011 10:42:26 AM PST by 30Moves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight
Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy. $20 million annual savings.

I hate that guy.

Seriously, this is a good start.

I think Senator Rand Paul is coming out with something twice this size, which is an even better start

35 posted on 01/20/2011 10:44:09 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Touch my tagline and I'll have you arrested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stymee

Now THAT’s a good start...


36 posted on 01/20/2011 10:46:02 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Agreed.


37 posted on 01/20/2011 10:52:03 AM PST by Dead Corpse (III%. The last line in the sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
“Kentucky’s junior Republican senator... about to unveil his own sweeping budget plan that would result in a $500 billion cut in just one year — about five times more than what the House GOP has promised to do.”

And about 2 times the size of this proposal. Works for me.

38 posted on 01/20/2011 10:57:32 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Touch my tagline and I'll have you arrested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

We have a $3.5 trillion annual budget. Even without inflation and no increases, that is $35 trillion over 10 years. $2.5 trillion represents a 7% cut in spending.


39 posted on 01/20/2011 10:59:40 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher
Check this out.
40 posted on 01/20/2011 11:01:23 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson