Skip to comments.
Life as we don't know it ... on Earth?
msnbc.com ^
| Dec. 2, 2010
Posted on 12/02/2010 10:17:58 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Sto Zvirat
So is this the earth shaking announcement NASA piqued the world for?
21
posted on
12/02/2010 9:54:30 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
I wouldn’t call it earth shaking, but its damned interesting and it changes the way we look at biology. Its been theorized that life like this could exist, and now its been found. Knowledge and learning are good things.
To: Sto Zvirat
Yes, it is exciting. Yes, they deserve more funding.
I just have an issue with making assumptions to such an extent that other possibilities are dismissed until a new “discovery” forces the scientific community to rethink their methods. Why not begin with the premise that other possibilities may exist even if we haven’t observed them?
23
posted on
12/02/2010 9:57:40 PM PST
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
To: Sto Zvirat
Does it work off of DNA information coding? Then it ain’t new, just new to NASA.
24
posted on
12/02/2010 10:00:03 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: BuckeyeTexan
"If science hasnt observed it, then it cannot and doesnt exist? So dismiss it as a possibility until its discovered?
The possibility is never "dismissed" (The Scientific method does not Allow for that), its just that since we haven't found one yet(essentially, discovered), there is little reason to expect it to exist, and hence the surprise. And its absolutely essential that when we something unlikely or rare, one check the science and be skeptical about it. Skepticism is Not to be confused with arrogance though one can see why that might be cause for confusion. The default position in science is one of skepticism, not belief. If the sun decides to not rise tomorrow, you hardly expect people to shrug and say "Huh, Interesting...". It is a necessarily unlikely event which should be cause for surprise. Besides, any perception of arrogance is necessarily about the people involved. "Scientists" aren't a stereotypical group of people with simple characterizations. There are arrogant ones and humble ones, (mostly) lefty ones and conservative ones(like me) but they can, in general, Not be typecast.
25
posted on
12/02/2010 11:24:50 PM PST
by
kroll
Thanks Free ThinkerNY. Astrobiology, panspermia, arsenic, exobiology...
26
posted on
12/06/2010 5:27:05 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
27
posted on
12/17/2010 10:57:19 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson