Posted on 08/11/2010 11:52:30 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
wow, steve jobs was the face in the apple commercial.
Thanks for the information.
Even if the photo is legally releasable to a third-party, it might accidentally come with your metadata.
Not good.
The illusion would be dispelled as a cynical ploy the moment I tried to type into, or menu navigate on, the "instant" app and found that I had to wait before it responded. Especially if it wasn't just one app that seemed to "freeze" upon appearing. Windows and most Linuxen do this the right way. What you see is what's ready.
So many place names are similar (is it Green Street or Greene Street?) that darn straight a cache is going to spy on your actual place name usage. Whom does it tattle to? The fuzz, if they get their hands on your phone.
They wouldn't do it if it were noticeable. We're dealing with tenth of a second times or less, faster than you can start typing, but enough to give your mind the impression of a more responsive UI.
Perception matters more than fact, because perception is fact to a user. Look at the chart below describing user reactions to a progress bar in a scientific study:
Those were the perceptions of the users of how long those operations took, although they all took exactly the same amount of time. Simply changing the behavior of a progress bar can make a user THINK the computer is doing something faster or more slowly. Specifically to this article, people thought Vista copied files more slowly than XP (even though it actually copied them faster) because 1) the progress didn't start until 12 seconds into the copy, making people think it took longer, and 2) the progress bar slowed down at the end as cached data was written, which makes people think it took longer. The SP1 "fix" for slow Vista file copy was only a change to the progress bar behavior. It didn't speed up copies at all.
Apple has historically concentrated on the perception of UI performance, while Microsoft usually concentrated on clock performance. That's a main reason why Apple's UI is better. These aren't tricks or illusions, this is simply engineering that accounts for the fact that perceptive and clock time are not the same. Apple software is usually designed for the way our minds work, not how fast a clock ticks.
Kubuntu’s KDE does have a little “bouncer” which appears as soon as one clicks for a program which is going to take some time to appear.
Good to know, oops, I mean, this makes no difference in my everyday life. ;’)
That sounds like a copy of the OS X Dock behavior.
I’ve always suspected that was the case, just never formally tested it.
I’ve got multiple machines side by side and typically just used the one that was easiest to see to initiate network tasks, but every so often a certain picky game on the Vista box would hork its permissions and I needed to deal with something before I could take the time to reset them. Everyone banged on how slow Vista was, but seemed to me that without fail, the machines took within a second or so of the same time for the same file copies/moves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.