Posted on 06/27/2010 7:36:34 PM PDT by Saije
I enjoyed the book and the movie ‘We Were Soldiers’. Especially when Sgt. Maj. Plumley (Sam Elliot) said “Custer was a wussie. You ain’t.” to Lt. Col. Moore (Mel Gibson). In a replay of that our Congress is the ‘wussies’ now, specifically the RINO’s and anyone against this country.
The Little Big Horn was a classic failure of intelligence. Others would include the Israeli 6 Oct 1973 Yom Kippor surprise attack (for Egypt and Syria) the Gorelick Wall precipitating 9/11 (for America).
The 7th Cavalry fought well in the Pusan Perimeter in Korea as well as at LZ XRAY in Viet Nam. This article was interesting to say the least. I too thought the flag was the property of the US Government (as another comment said), the US Army in particular, and as such should be returned to them. If sold the flag and the monies received for it should be confiscated by the Government. (I would not condone this action in many circumstances but this one for sure) Free enterprise, for me, has no place here. As far as I am concerned the Detroit Institute is just SOOL!
That flag should be in the Smithsonian or at West Point Academy. Hopefully the winning bidder will donate it to an appropriate museum.
I’ve always thought that Custer planned a pincer movement of some kind where Reno attacked on one end of the camp and Custer would attack from the other end.
It seems as though Custer refused to accept the fact that the Indian village he was attacking was freakin’ huge - until it was too late.
It seems as though Custer, at least once, went down to the river in an attempt to ford it but was turned away and headed back up to what was referred to the ridgeline he had been following as he tried to find the other end of the Indian camp. It was up along that area where he was finally encircled.
There was a study done back in the late 80’s or early 90’s that examined archeological evidence found on the battle field. They noticed certain marks on shell casings that seemed to indicate that Custer’s men experienced a greater than expected number of shell misfires and jammed carbines that led to a decline in fire disclipline.
Just a theory, that’s all...
“And what was the point in sending Benteen off on a wild goose chase?”
Custer’s point was twofold: (1) He wanted to block any attempt of the hostiles to flee toward the immediate south; (2) He did not want a repeat of the Washita fight which nearly cost him his hair and those of his command (in attacking Black Kettle’s camp on the Washita in 1868 Custer failed to determine the existence of several other, larger camps nearby, and when those camps got wind of the attack on Black Kettle’s band they came out in force and could very well have wiped out Custer’s command — as they did Major Elliott’s squad earlier that day — had Custer not held a lot of women and children from Black Kettle’s band hostage).
“I personally can’t understand why someone wpuld cough up millions for this artifact.”
Well, I’ve been an avid student of the LBH fight for some fifty years now, and if I had that kind of money I’d buy it, and would leave it to the museum in my will.
Yeah, the Sioux were shocked. Shocked I tell you. LOL
Roster 7th U.S. Cavalry Regiment’s Little Big Horn Operations “personnel in combat” 25-26 June 1876
http://www.us7thcavalry.com/roster_lbh.htm
I've seen that a couple of times and it was a great documentary. It would have been so cool to be a part of that going around with metal detectors finding bullets and shell casings.
These days it may well be bought by the Lakotas or Cheyennes and displayed in a casino.
You do know that the problem with books and their revision of history is not always accurate? I’m not really sure what happened here...and probably never will. Factual accounts seem to go by the wayside... You have to believe what you want to by reading several accounts of the action.
It is really a shame that our education system (including the publication of books) has become so inaccurate or just plain false... Sign of the times I suppose...
The History Channel many years ago had an Oli Stone tin-foil hat episode where Grant was jealous of Custer so he gave his intel to the Indians and had him whacked.
I’m somewhat curious as to why President Grant, in the last months of his Presidency, would be jealous of Custer? To me, something does not add up.
I saw one of those shows about the Battle of the Little Bighorn on History Channel also. Some pinhead “expert” had come to the conclusion that all of the soldiers didn’t fight on the hill as is always depicted but that they all ran away down the draws and washes like a bunch of cowards. He came to this conclusion because that’s where he found many empty cartridge casings. I’m no “expert” but I have spent some time out looking for arrowheads. If you throw artifacts like that on the side of a hill and come back 150 years later to find them, only a pinhead would look for them on the side of the hill where they were thrown. It’s a weather/gravity thing. The clown on History Channel didn’t seem very familiar with the phenomenon.
There was a Twilight Zone show..a national guard tank crew was taken back in time to 1876..with the tank..
They joined the battle..but left the tank behind.
>>> They joined the battle..but left the tank behind.
Everybody understands soldiering in the decades between the Civil War and WW1 was a tankless occupation.
Libby worked hard to protect the legacy of her husband after the battle. As an aside, she owned the table which Grant and Lee used to sign the surrender at the Maclean house at Appomattox Courthouse. I’ll bet it would bring as much as the flag.
He said, as he opened the bidding...
The Brits better get out a map, while the Little Bighorn battlefield is in Montana the sacred Lakota Black Hills are in South Dakota.
Do you feel that the books I mentioned, A Terrible Glory by James Donovan, and The Last Stand by Nathanial Philbrick, are not accurate in their historical representation? If so, how so?
I think that is the general consensus, but I thought there was testimony from Reno's men that they could see Custer on a ridge waving his hat - at the time, Reno was in full retreat. If those stories are true, Custer must have known Reno's attack was a failure when Custer was still 2 or 3 miles from where he meet his end.
I thought Reno was told by Custer to attack and he (Custer) would support him. Even Reno wasn't clear on what "support" was supposed to mean because he anticipated Custer was going to follow him in the attack.
I know some think that was Custer's plan - if he could get into a position to separate the women and children from the warriors, he would then be able to intimidate the warriors into returning to the reservation. Maybe that was the point of Reno's attack - The warriors would focus on attacking Reno while the women and children would flee in the opposite direction. It would have been nice if Custer had bothered to inform Reno and some of his other officers who survived what "the plan" was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.