Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ok, This needs to be said..(Message for Sarah Palin)

Posted on 06/18/2010 10:17:01 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last
To: getitright

I agree with you. It smacks of total cronyism. Like favors are being called in. Tired of it....no matter who it is. Call a spade a spade and a RINO a RINO. THAT would have gotten my attention.

The appearance after “the speech” on O’Reilly was a bit weird. When he asked her what she’d do in response, it seemed like she dodged....why?


141 posted on 06/18/2010 2:38:18 PM PDT by my small voice (A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Well, I’m looking for “knock in” factors, all you’re concerned about is “knock out” factors. You have become a victim of the cult of personality, which unfortunately is a very poor strategy for picking a president.


142 posted on 06/18/2010 2:58:03 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
I've opened up a number of "Sarah Threads" today, and I'm gonna have to totally avoid them, AGAIN.

A little tiny bit of them goes a long long long way. I know supporters of Governor Palin in real life, but absolutely none of them are remotely what I'd term 'Sarah Idolators.'

LOL

Thanks for all your nice posts, but I'm outta here, ya know???

143 posted on 06/18/2010 3:02:09 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

How many times can you post this same vanity? Honestly, they’re all the same.


144 posted on 06/18/2010 6:29:04 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
I am either a troll, a creep or mentally ill.

I doubt anyone would go that far. However, whether it's a crush or hero worship, your obsession with the woman is indeed creepy.

145 posted on 06/18/2010 6:35:20 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Well said...


146 posted on 06/18/2010 11:24:23 PM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (She's runnin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

‘You have become a victim of the cult of personality, which unfortunately is a very poor strategy for picking a president.’

If we have the right candidate,why clutch at straws, and argue about the nature of strategy used to select them? Time to unite behind the candidate IMHO.


147 posted on 06/18/2010 11:27:37 PM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (She's runnin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalinForPresident2012; Bob J
‘You have become a victim of the cult of personality, which unfortunately is a very poor strategy for picking a president.’
If we have the right candidate,why clutch at straws, and argue about the nature of strategy used to select them? Time to unite behind the candidate IMHO.


The n00b troll speaketh. It hasn't been established that Sarah Palin is the 'right' candidate, her embrace of conservatives one day, RINOs the next, only establish that she is an 'inconsistent conservative' and when she states repeatedly that she "shares John McCain's vision for America", that definitely establishes that her shared 'vision' is NOT a conservative one because anyone with a room temperature IQ (even a n00b Palinbot troll) ought to know that McCain is NOT a conservative!

As for 'uniting' behind a candidate, until that candidate actually announces they are entering the primaries as a presidential contender, there IS no 'candidate'.

Back under your bridge troll.
148 posted on 06/19/2010 12:24:13 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: pissant; se_ohio_young_conservative
Aren’t you gonna do one of these. I’m confident that it would at least be logically based and more interesting than the others’ efforts here.

Not my style pissant, but I thank you for the complement.

se_ohio_young_conservative,

You need to quit wearing your emotions on your sleeve.

Get a tougher skin.

A lot of these anti-Palin posters are just trying to get a rise out of you, don't let them.

Fight back with facts and logic, leave the nonsense to them.

Don't give them ammunition.

Most of the time their bitterness, and hatred, and I do mean hatred, doesn't need to be challenged all that much because it is so blatant, they simply tell on them selves with their nonsense posts.
149 posted on 06/19/2010 1:55:24 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalinForPresident2012

“If we have the right candidate,why clutch at straws, and argue about the nature of strategy used to select them?”

Counting dimples is no strategy for selecting a president.


150 posted on 06/19/2010 8:29:48 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

If Sarah Palin were to debate Barack Obama. She would kick his butt, you know that more than anyone because you are smart. It would be like Kennedy vs Nixon. People would see who has the most passion for America.

Obama represents the past. Palin represents a new generation.


151 posted on 06/19/2010 8:58:33 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Unfortunately I don’t agree. Palin’s cliche driven responses to most of the questions asked would drive away most of the independents, middle roaders and blue dog democrats she needs to win.

Why is it so many of those on the far left and right misplace passion for competence?


152 posted on 06/19/2010 9:05:17 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Did she drive away moderates when she was debating Joe Biden ? That was not even a contest. It was John McCain who couldn’t debate Obama to save his life.

Passion is important because 80% of Reagan conservative is just building confidence. making the country believe in it’s self again.


153 posted on 06/19/2010 9:12:27 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Melas; se_ohio_young_conservative
I doubt anyone would go that far. However, whether it's a crush or hero worship, your obsession with the woman is indeed creepy.

What is truly creepy is the all-consuming hatred of Sarah Palin felt by some of those on this board.

154 posted on 06/19/2010 12:01:35 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Again, look at my posting history back to 2008. I have been supporting Sarah Palin since that speech in Dayton. What do you expect Palin supporters to do ?

I expect you to understand at the cellular level that disliking a politician for whatever reason isn't wrong. Not supporting Sarah Palin isn't wrong. Not coming unhinged every time someone criticizes her isn't wrong. That's what I expect.

Disagreeing is patriotic. Disagreeing is American. Disagreeing, even vehemently, means that we reject royalty and special treatment. Disagreement, regardless of its form means that politicians work for us and that we do not work for them. Disagreement makes us citizens, not subjects.

That's what I expect you to understand.

You know why?

Because any politician that needs protection from mouthy voters, political opponents, or pundits needs to find another job right away.

Any politician that can be "hurt" (your words in post #7)...

I am trying to stop the attacks. Nothing more. Nothing less. It has nothing to do with my ego.

This is hurting Governor Palin. she needs to know that

...needs to step away from the podium immediately and go work on their golf swing. If what is "hurting" Palin are the decisions she's making, then any and all criticism is valid and that becomes something she alone needs to deal with.

People are imperfect. Politicians are particularly imperfect. They have it in their minds that they're smart enough and wise enough to rule the rest of us. That's what they're asking to do when they stand up on that stage and ask for our votes and our money. Some are smart, strong, and wise enough. Some are not.

It is wrong to think that any politician anywhere deserves any special consideration. This is a job they beg for. They either need to toughen up and roll with the punches, or walk away.

Men and women from the Revolutionary War onward did not give their all so that I could sit back on my rear end and worry myself stupid over a politician. None of those heros gave their all so that someone who wants to protect a politician could tell the rest of us what to think, or how to think, or what to write about any politician.

It's our job to decide if they are worthy. It's their job to toughen up, learn from their mistakes, or get the heck out of the way.

Personally, I doubt that Sarah Palin needs much of anything in the way of protection. I think you do her a great dishonor by thinking that she does.

P.S. I very much wanted Mark Sanford to run in 2012, but his flaws became all too apparent and he self-destructed in spectacular form. How politicians perform when they make bad decisions is part of how we know whether or not they're worth voting for. Sanford, as it turns out, is not worth voting for.Better to know it now than when they're ensconced in power.

As hard as it was to watch, that is what is supposed to happen. As hard as it is to watch, look at what's happening now that we have someone untested, who was treated with kid gloves, sitting in the White House.

155 posted on 06/19/2010 12:50:35 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Just where does his lying mouth stop and his awesome hair begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Why complain if the candidate of choice is physically attractive and hence able to appeal to different segments of voters for different reasons. Nothing wrong with marketing a good product. Packaging counts too.


156 posted on 06/20/2010 9:25:47 PM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (She's runnin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalinForPresident2012

Well I could sit her and explain the down side to oversexing your candidate and exactly which demographic groups you’ll impact, but what’s the use.

Palin wearing those tight t-shirts is the dumbest thing she could do. It tells me one more time she isn;t ready for the presidency.


157 posted on 06/21/2010 12:27:33 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

All I can add is I;m split on Palin. Like her and what she says sometimes. But it has come down to where I disagree on her endorsements about 60/40. And therefore, I hope it don’t know what it signifies. I’m waiting to see what she does in 2012. As for now, I’m open to others. Not putting all eggs in a basket. DeMint, Paul Ryan, Bachmann and Steve King coem to mind.


158 posted on 06/24/2010 8:05:45 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson