Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pac-10 to decide by end of year
espn ^ | June 7, 2010, 2:21 AM | Mark Saxon

Posted on 06/07/2010 8:57:56 AM PDT by Bad~Rodeo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Bad~Rodeo

The Big 12 is done for. Not big enough to feed Texas ego and not in the big TV markets which is what’s driving all of this. Texas will go where they want, and bring along whomever they want - probably to PAC 10.

The future will be 4 16-team conferences, all with TV network deals. That will be the new Division I, everyone else will be Division II whether they are called that or not.

I used to think that Frank Broyles made a big mistake when he took Arkansas to the SEC. I thought that Arkansas would be much better off playing Big 8 schools like Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Missouri, and of course the Texas schools when the SWC folded. Its now looking like old Frank made the right choice.


21 posted on 06/07/2010 9:30:56 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Texas can have their “fiefdom” in the SEC as well, if the SEC goes to 4 four-team divisions. The SEC would be THE conference. A lot more money than if they go to the PAC-10.


22 posted on 06/07/2010 9:33:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

They could have a “Texas Division” either way, but the TV markets demographics actually favor the PAC 10. I personally think that would be a bad choice, but money talks in this little drill.


23 posted on 06/07/2010 9:39:37 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The team for Texas to beat in the Big 12 is Oklahoma. Win that game, and they punch their ticket to the title game. (unless there is a three way tie in the South). Even if they lose the title game, they still will likely get a BCS at-large bid. In this “Pac-16” scenario, the same would be true.

That absoultely would not be true in the SEC West. Texas would have to get past LSU, Alabama and Auburn (and Arkansas is no pushover) just to get to Atlanta. That’s more talent than Texas faces in the entire Big 12 or would face in an entire “Pac 16”. If it doesn’t win the SEC, then Texas has to compete with those schools, plus Florida, Tennessee, Georgia and potential SEC East additions for an at-large birth or even a tier-one bowl.


24 posted on 06/07/2010 9:50:04 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
The team for Texas to beat in the Big 12 is Oklahoma.

Ehhh, wrong. Beating Zero U, OU, is more a rivalry than a stepping stone to the Big Dance. Texas' mantra is to beat EVERYONE we face.

25 posted on 06/07/2010 10:12:19 AM PDT by Bad~Rodeo (INTEGRATE or VACATE: BoycottMexicoNow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
CBS sports is reporting:

Pac-10 administrators arrived in San Francisco this weekend to a report that the conference was ready to invite Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Baylor from the Big 12 to create a 16-team megaconference. There has also been a report that Baylor could replace Colorado in that scenario or the Pac-10 could choose to keep the status quo or add only two teams in a smaller move.

26 posted on 06/07/2010 10:15:14 AM PDT by Bad~Rodeo (INTEGRATE or VACATE: BoycottMexicoNow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bad~Rodeo
This is insanity. The whole "BCS is a monopoly that only caters to the major conferences" is even more an issue if we get some mega conference that's auto awarded 2 BCS slots. The lower tier conferences will go even more off on this issue.

I think the Big12, SEC, and Big10 will figure this out and it won't be as radical as formations of 16 team conferences.

As for the PAC-10, leave it the hell alone. I'll totally against adding any teams east of the rockies to a division where most of the schools are a stones throw from the pacific ocean.

27 posted on 06/07/2010 1:20:08 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson