Ohio teenager wins US spelling bee crown
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10244237.stm
EXCERPT:
A 14-year-old girl from the US state of Ohio has won the country's coveted annual National Spelling Bee.
Anamika Veeramani, from North Royalton, claimed victory by correctly spelling the word stromuhr - a medical term.
She takes home $40,000 (£27,450) in cash and prizes, as well as the coveted championship title.
Anamika's winning word, stromuhr, is the term for an instrument used to measure the velocity of blood flow.
It is the third year in a row that an Indian-American has won the championship.
The popularity of the spelling bee - a peculiarly American tradition - has grown greatly over the past decade, partly as a result of the Academy Award-nominated documentary Spellbound.
The Boston Red Sox and Chicago White Sox are examples of what this movement tried to impose during the late 19th/early 20th century.
What kind of loser complains about the difficulty of a spelling bee?
If these people had their way, English would devolve into a mixture of Engrish and LOLcat speak.
Spelling has already been simplified to the extreme. Just ask any teenager who texts.
It could cause an increase in taxes, but it would be worth it!
What makes English the most “wealthy” of languages is that we have the largest, richest lexicon. We are, simply, not snobbish about adopting (and adapting) “outside” words as our own. I love this.
Even in an instructive profession, however, I’m just not possessive of particular word spellings. (Don’t worry: I still insist on proper spellings!) We’ve already changed the true ENGLISH spellings of a number of words—like color (colour) and center (centre)—to better suit us...AND Shakespeare spelled even his own NAME in numerous ways.
I see the need for consistency (litigation, and all); but I just don’t feel a moral connection to traditional, particular spellings.
I blame the Great Vowel Shift (and its minor brother) for most of the mess.
(Go ahead...shoot! I have thick skin.)