Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google Ditches Microsoft's Windows Over Security Issues, Report Claims
PC World ^ | 6/1/2010 | Tom Spring

Posted on 06/01/2010 7:28:23 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/01/2010 7:28:23 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

!


2 posted on 06/01/2010 7:31:15 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Question for computer geeks:

Is it Windows security sucks compared to other OS or hackers just like attacking Windows because of more “bang for the buck”?


3 posted on 06/01/2010 7:31:41 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yes.


4 posted on 06/01/2010 7:34:47 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Both.


5 posted on 06/01/2010 7:35:33 AM PDT by desertfreedom765
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hopefully they will hire someone else to do the Google Toolbar for IE, that thing sucks.


6 posted on 06/01/2010 7:35:45 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Well Google is a direct competitor of Microsoft so this makes sense.


7 posted on 06/01/2010 7:36:14 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Both.


8 posted on 06/01/2010 7:37:20 AM PDT by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yes, and yes.

The other thing is that Windows is a PITA to administer.


9 posted on 06/01/2010 7:38:26 AM PDT by B Knotts (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
hackers just like attacking Windows because of more “bang for the buck”?

Any hacker who would make the first real security issue for MacOS would be the most famous hacker on the planet.

There is a genuine reason for the security of MacOS and it is not because the hackers ignore Macs.

10 posted on 06/01/2010 7:39:58 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hehe - I ditched Google for the same reason, as well as the liberal slant to their results.


11 posted on 06/01/2010 7:43:08 AM PDT by Ingtar (If Palin were perfect, she could campaign for godhood. Since she is human, Obama's job will do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

At a Mac conference 2 years ago, someone took one of the challenges and hacked a Mac via a Firefox exploit in under an hour. I wouldn’t feel exactly safe on any platform attached to the internet.


12 posted on 06/01/2010 7:45:29 AM PDT by Ingtar (If Palin were perfect, she could campaign for godhood. Since she is human, Obama's job will do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

The reason Windows is such a security risk is that the system can be modified through the web browser.

Windows makes this possible because they feel the need to keep a lid on piracy, so there are all kinds of holes leading into the system.

Mac has none of this. You do not even need a serial number to install the OS, and nothing in any browser or in the cloud can access your system without your permission. And even your permission cannot change critical files.


13 posted on 06/01/2010 7:45:35 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

Make that Safari, not Firefox. It’s almost a Monday.

A link:

http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html


14 posted on 06/01/2010 7:49:22 AM PDT by Ingtar (If Palin were perfect, she could campaign for godhood. Since she is human, Obama's job will do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This strictly PR for Google to back Microsoft. Where there are crooks and robbers, they will find a way into any system.


15 posted on 06/01/2010 7:49:25 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This strictly PR for Google to bash Microsoft. Where there are crooks and robbers, they will find a way into any system.


16 posted on 06/01/2010 7:49:52 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Windows just became safer. For the China-based hackers, the target was Google, not Windows. Windows was only the vehicle of attack. They’ll now turn their attention to Mac OS X and Linux exploits, while Microsoft will continue to fortify Windows via Windows7.


17 posted on 06/01/2010 7:53:22 AM PDT by Be Free (Liberalism is a disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
"At a Mac conference 2 years ago, someone took one of the challenges and hacked a Mac via a Firefox exploit in under an hour."

The truth is, the guy (Charlie Something) arrived with a pre-arranged exploit he'd discovered months before and kept to himself. IIRC it required a compliant user, too. The first round of exploits, with the machines merely connected to the network, failed across all platforms.

The notion that the Mac was cracked "within minutes" was totally not the case. The hacker in question is an unethical attention whore. Oh, and if you looked at the photos of the guy in action, you'd note his personal machine of choice was... a Mac.
18 posted on 06/01/2010 7:58:20 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
"This strictly PR for Google to bash Microsoft."

Not really. Although Google can be faulted for running IE6 this late in the game... one might say they were asking for it. But there is no doubt, none at all, that Linux and OS X are safer operating systems in real-world usage. The virus statistics speak for themselves, both in desktop and server applications.
19 posted on 06/01/2010 8:00:24 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Bang for the buck. This story is a poser as Google is pushing their OS.


20 posted on 06/01/2010 8:13:18 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson