Gays in Military = Sex in Barracks

http://www.familyresearchinst.org ^ | Feb 22 2010 | Dr. Paul Cameron Ph. D

[RipSawyer]

Ru Paul and Ron Paul are two very different persons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APqD2mfKPCI

[fr_freak]

Earth to folks...Rupaul would not be able to make it through boot camp and gays emulate him/her so I don’t think you will see an influx of gays joining the military. First they would have to get through boot camp. Some of them really could not handle that. I really believe that nothing would change. Maybe that one guy who was outted by a former friend would be able to stay, but otherwise I can’t see how those fems would join.

Don't be ridiculous.

First, there are plenty of homos who can make it through Basic. Always have been. Just because they like it in the rear doesn't automatically mean they can't run 20 miles, do pushups, or shoot a rifle.

Second, we've already seen what happened to Basic Training when women were allowed in - the physical standards dropped dramatically. Listen to Basic Training stories (doesn't matter which service) sometime of oldtimers who went in before the 80s and compare them to the stories of people who went in after the 80s. The training has been dumbed down even in the combat arms due to political correctness and whiny couch potatoes who have their rich parents call their congressmen when the Drill Sergeant gets too mean. If homosexuality were legitimized in the services, the standards would be lowered, if necessary, to get more gays in.

The number one problem with repealing "DADT" is that there would be no way to maintain discipline. Sex in barracks would be the least of anyone's worries. The real problem would be sex in the field: sex in foxholes, sex in track vehicles, sex out in the middle of the woods, etc. etc. Right now, most combat arms are limited to men only, so when you're out in the field, you have no sex options. If you had mixed-sex combat units, or units which did not automatically penalize homosexual behavior, you'd have rampant problems with sex in the ranks at all times. Because let me tell you - one thing that months in the field will do is make you freaking horny, and these are mostly young guys who are naturally horny in the first place.

[aSeattleConservative]

I stand by the fact that gays will not make it through boot camp. How are they going to????? Have you ever seen them play sports??? They aren’t very coordinated.

You're probably right. Homosexuals aren't noted for being outdoors type people either. I'm sure just the thought of being a Scout Master and going on overnight campouts with 12 year old boys must be repulsive to them.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

hehe I know, it’s just that some anti-Ron Paul people use the names interchangeably.

[meadsjn]

Before long, the U.S. may be defended by the sex-obsessed and those who can tolerate kowtowing to them.

Before long, the U.S. would be left undefended.

[meadsjn]

Is Obama gay or something too? This is a sick world.

According to Larry Sinclair, yes.

[gidget7]

One has to wonder how lpng it would be until the military looked like our prison system, with rapes being accepted as just part of it. It is a disgrace that it happens in prisons, but it would be terror in our military.

[aSeattleConservative]

I don’t recognize homosexuality as a mental illness, though apparently it was considered a mental illness in America until 1973

Nor did "gay pioneer" (I believe that's what the baby-killing, pro sodomite Marxist that occupies the White House called him) Frank Kameny. Kameny was responsible for having homosexuality removed from the American Psychiatric Association's list of mental disorders in 1973. Kameny not long ago was quoted as saying "There is nothing wrong with bestiality, as long as the animal doesn't mind".

I don’t care about the HIV rates of homosexuals (the military tests for that, and the military doesn’t discharge servicemen who come up HIV+, gay or straight). I don’t particularly care about their rates of STDs (in theory, they’d only be infecting each other).

For those of you that follow basketball, be it scholastic or professional, you're probably familiar with this policy: " A player with blood on his uniform must remain out of the game until he can change his jersey. This policy aims to prevent transmission of HIV and other blood-borne infectious diseases. Any time there is blood, the athlete must come out of the game until the bleeding stops."
If the sport of basketball is so strict about passing infectious diseases, why would you want to allow homosexuals, a group whose lifestyle is 50 times more likely to contract HIV than other groups; a group that isn't even allowed to donate blood at blood banks, into a military/combat setting where their blood is likely to permeate other soldiers? Perhaps in our new "PC army", soldiers will be issued whistles to notify the enemy: "Stop the war, I need to change my blood soaked uniform!
Isn't it amazing that our country is more concerned about the health of our athletes who supply us with what amounts to "entertainment", then the health and well-being of our soldiers who keep us free?

There are a lot of straight servicemen and women who ‘choose’ to practice that activity in their heterosexual relationships, and none of them consider themselves mentally ill or perverts.

While acts such as adultery are prosecuted in the military, the act of heterosexuality is not a mental illness or a perversion. While Frank "there's nothing wrong with bestiality as long as the animal doesn't mind" Kameny might have a different opinion on the matter, homosexuality is a lifestyle that every major world religion and thousands of years of history have held to be immoral and destructive from a spiritual and emotional -- and certainly a physical standpoint.

[sport]

Mark

[little jeremiah]

Very well said!

[aSeattleConservative]

Good to see your font once again my FRiend!

[little jeremiah]

This account has been suspended or banned.

ha ha ha.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you and I’m always glad to see your comments.

[traditional1]

"This soldiering thing isn't a game, and you are wrong by a wide margin, the submariners do not want women brought into their sub duty."

Exactly my point; political correctness, diversity, and other such nonsense has no business in a fighting force....but that's what we've come to.

[Scotsman will be Free]

No. Homosexuals in the military are a yes or no proposition. In otherwords, there is a valid reason for having them or there isn’t.
Your analogy is so inaccurate it’s not worth arguing.
I will say, that you are good at ignoring simple questions to your posts.

[Scotsman will be Free]

Damn, son. You are a rare critter. A Seattle conservative. Have they put you on the endangered species list yet? Stay safe in that liberal pus hole.

[Scotsman will be Free]

Hurly tended to get a little emotional in his defense of homosexuals in the military, didn’t he. Made it look like he had a personal stake in their being allowed.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Amen!

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Hurly tended to get a little emotional in his defense of homosexuals in the military, didn’t he. Made it look like he had a personal stake in their being allowed.”

Hurly went from the den of iniquity, to a den with no equity ;-)

[Scotsman will be Free]

LOL!