Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen. David Petraeus Republican Nominee for US President 2012?
January 10th 2010

Posted on 01/10/2010 4:04:58 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Steelfish
No No No. Military men lose. It's been proved over and over again. (But then against the Maasai I think anybody would win.)
21 posted on 01/10/2010 4:31:48 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Don’t think he’d even consider it.”

He’s already said he wants nothing to do with running for President.


22 posted on 01/10/2010 4:31:51 PM PST by ScottinVA (The arrogance of this Congress is staggering. November 2010 can't get here quickly enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yes, I did. If you have a little over an hour to spare try this.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/771133


23 posted on 01/10/2010 4:34:48 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Why not? Let him put his issues out there for all of us to see. Lord knows we don’t have anyone else.


24 posted on 01/10/2010 4:35:35 PM PST by cubreporter ( Rush is coming back on Wed. Welcome back Rush. God bless you for all you do for all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Rice/Patraeus


25 posted on 01/10/2010 4:36:00 PM PST by cubreporter ( Rush is coming back on Wed. Welcome back Rush. God bless you for all you do for all of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

No thanks. He calls himself a Rockefeller Republican and that’s all I need to know about his leanings.

From the article linked below:

“Petraeus is registered to vote as a Republican in New Hampshire—he once described himself to a friend as a northeastern Republican, in the tradition of Nelson Rockefeller—but he said that around 2002, after he became a two-star general, he stopped voting.”

Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/09/08/080908fa_fact_coll#ixzz0cG9wwtbj


26 posted on 01/10/2010 4:37:56 PM PST by nomoremods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Former military leaders rarely have strong, well-considered views on domestic issues, except for a tendency to favor federal authority. As a result, like Eisenhower, they usually end up being strong on national security but moderate on domestic issues.


27 posted on 01/10/2010 4:38:47 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Both Spain under Francisco Franco and France under Gen. De Gaulle kept the leftists in their place!


28 posted on 01/10/2010 4:39:19 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nomoremods
but he said that around 2002, after he became a two-star general, he stopped voting.”

I think that's terrible. It's a bad example and if true he should have kept it under his hat.
29 posted on 01/10/2010 4:44:45 PM PST by visualops (Pray for the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"Both Spain under Francisco Franco and France under Gen. De Gaulle kept the leftists in their place!"

The United States, should not aspire to be a dictatorship.

30 posted on 01/10/2010 4:55:21 PM PST by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The fact he dont want to job tells me he is smarter than most running.
He would have to answer questions about basic conservative issues before he get my vote.


31 posted on 01/10/2010 5:15:45 PM PST by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IntolerantOfTreason
a liberal would not have lasted this long in the military.

That is an incorrect assertion and please don't fall into the trap of thinking that the military is no place for liberals. Some liberal shitbirds can fly really high at the Pentagon.

As for Petraeus, I have no clue as to his philosophy... and that is completely proper. And I assume that he has little use or respect for idiots like PIAPS and Obama, who called him a liar during the Democratic Senate's "surge" show trial. I can respect a real leader. And a real man would be a vast improvement over the femme drug addict currently in the White House.

How about Petraeus/Honore heading up the "Stop Yer Bitching, America" party ticket? Two honorable and decent leaders that can tell this country's whiners to just STFU. Might be the only cure for this sick nation's malaise.

32 posted on 01/10/2010 5:22:56 PM PST by upstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Brilliant general that he is, Petraeus is a low key, low charisma type of guy, and I don't know why people think 1) that he could somehow put together a winning national campaign against Obama when he has no political network and has never run for anything in his life because of his Army career, and 2) why he would even want to run.

Bottom-line--nonstarter.

33 posted on 01/10/2010 5:40:55 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This one is even sillier than the speculation about McCain/Lieberman.


34 posted on 01/10/2010 5:51:44 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

He who has reportedly described himself as a “Rockefeller Republican?” No thanks, we already dodged a bullet with Colin Powell.


35 posted on 01/10/2010 5:55:12 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Then you should have posted something about the General’s politics, just posting a name of a guy that no one knows anything about and asking if we should make this guy president, seems like an especially senseless vanity.


36 posted on 01/10/2010 6:03:32 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jz638

I would give it a thought or two but I would like to know more about his views on the important issues of the day. A general can be a great president—we have had some good ones in the past.


37 posted on 01/10/2010 6:08:36 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

In the US, candidates running as war heroes tend to lose (Dole, Kerry , McCain)


38 posted on 01/10/2010 6:14:40 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I like Ike!


39 posted on 01/10/2010 6:18:48 PM PST by Sybeck1 (Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Mmm, Mmm, Mmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

The general has a number of published works, unlike other potential candidates coming from outside the normal political channels. I don’t know if his expressed views will conflict with the average American’s views on the issues of the day, however he has had to stand for and defend, his works a number of times. Unlike the academic record of our current president, his academic and professional work can be examined and judged on its own merit. I’m sure he hasn’t taken public positions on some social issues of importance of conservatives, but he does have a long and strong public background.


40 posted on 01/10/2010 6:25:35 PM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson