Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

15,000 Will Die From CT Scans Done In 1 Year
Reuters ^ | December 14th 2009

Posted on 12/14/2009 6:26:49 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Steelfish

I have CT scans once every two years. If I survive the original disease, I’ll let you guys know about the possible cancer. LOL


21 posted on 12/14/2009 6:50:36 PM PST by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

Exactly.

No way they can gather this data cleanly and make such bold accusations. There is totally a cohort design problem with this.

And it definitely fits with BHO:

Take your tonsils out? Maybe its just allergies?
Ever thought of that doctor?


22 posted on 12/14/2009 6:50:49 PM PST by schwingdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Orange Tabby’s cause Leukemia.

35,000 Canadian Women killed by cats each year!!!

Newspapers never lie, and data doesnt need to be released. Just clap your hands and believe.


23 posted on 12/14/2009 6:51:57 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Yup, first thought I had, too. God help us.


24 posted on 12/14/2009 6:53:01 PM PST by WVRockDJ (Mountaineer by birth; USMC by choice; Christian by Grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devolve
Another scare tactic. Soon they will try to scare us of all procedures so we won't even go to a doctor, lol.
25 posted on 12/14/2009 6:54:47 PM PST by potlatch (ACTIONS - Speak Louder Than Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The dose from them is pretty high.

A general X-Ray is typically a 40 to 60 micro-grey dose.

The exam exposure lasts for 30 to 500 milliseconds.

A CT lasts for 1 minute to 3 minutes or more. So it is a large total dose. But the need for such an exam typically outweighs the radiation risk. This applies to all radiography.

With PET scans they use this flouro-glucose that is highly radioactive. But, cancer absorbs the glucose at a different rate than normal tissue, and thus such a scan, while posing certain risks, is the least of your health concerns.

MRI is pumped with microwave RF.

Nuclear Medicine is for function studies like cardiology. So, is the dose from a little Technetium worth having a heart attack by not knowing.

In life nothing is free. And modern medicine is based on the advances in the ability to do ever more complicated exams before cutting the patient with a knife yeilding much better outcomes for the patient

So don’t worry. Nothing is going to happen to you as a result of your CT scan


26 posted on 12/14/2009 6:54:55 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
I read the article and the article footnoted that said they calculated the radiation risk. They did not indicate the method of calculating the risk, they just said they calculated it. I’d like to know the assumptions they made and the statistics of risks they used. That should be in the article, and it was not.
27 posted on 12/14/2009 6:56:58 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

THe article came from MSNBC

Looks like a farewell kick from MSNBC to GE Medical Systems.


28 posted on 12/14/2009 7:01:58 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

More news in order to deny services under 0bama care.
* * *

Bingo, and the MRI you underwent does seem to have become the diagnostic test of choice.


29 posted on 12/14/2009 7:02:43 PM PST by Canedawg (Bring lawyers, guns and money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

“Savings” will pay for Abominablecare!


30 posted on 12/14/2009 7:05:06 PM PST by devolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Obviously, we need to rely on dowsing rods, oh, and euthanasia. :’)


31 posted on 12/14/2009 7:08:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

[“Savings” will pay for Abominablecare!]

Yep, can’t cost them anything when you’re dead!


32 posted on 12/14/2009 7:09:50 PM PST by potlatch (ACTIONS - Speak Louder Than Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Precisely...following closely the disinformation about mammograms and the out and out lie (according to my husband) about prostrate cancer. Is the general public actually so stupid as to not notice this?
33 posted on 12/14/2009 7:11:21 PM PST by pepperdog (As Israel goes, so goes America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Agree fully; my very first thought exactly when I heard it today on the radio.

It’s about risk vs benefit. Sure there is a radiation exposure, but if you don’t get a CT, your condition is not diagnosed, and you die, it doesn’t matter how much radiation you were spared.

I suspect many more reports like this to be coming out in the future...


34 posted on 12/14/2009 7:12:24 PM PST by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I don't think so. I have Kidney Cancer (RCC) and have been getting 12 ct's a year (chest, abdomen and pelvis 4 x's a year) and I've been warned several times by my oncologist that there's a huge dose of radiation with every scan and some people wind up with cancer from ct's while looking for other cancers.

There have been several improvements in the care and treatment of RCC that lessen the need for so many sets of scans, imho, so my onc and I decided to cut back to 1 scan every 6 months for now...but geez I've had a BUNCH of scans in the last 4 years. Probably 25 or more.

35 posted on 12/14/2009 7:14:35 PM PST by pgkdan ( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

No...one won’t do anything. Cancer patients get many scans...they’re the ones at risk.


36 posted on 12/14/2009 7:16:14 PM PST by pgkdan ( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

More crap I don’t believe for a second.


37 posted on 12/14/2009 7:19:01 PM PST by libbylu ( Palin begins from Wasilla not only a campaign, an Iditarod of a crusade ....YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

.

Terminalcare


38 posted on 12/14/2009 7:26:48 PM PST by devolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Minimalcare and scare.


39 posted on 12/14/2009 7:28:45 PM PST by potlatch (ACTIONS - Speak Louder Than Words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
In general, a CT is not ordered unless there is some issue where an axial slice type of exam is needed. Blocked intestines, blood in the cranium, etc. So a little radiation exposure is the least of your health concerns at the moment.

Or for insurance purposes, something to point to in court. Defensive medicine, in other words.

40 posted on 12/14/2009 7:35:32 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson