Posted on 12/13/2009 6:52:26 AM PST by Borges
Theater DLP’s are mostly if not all 3-chip designs, each with its dedicated color RGB with no color wheel.
The Dolby system adds a color wheel in front of the lens that is synched to the projector.
Blu-ray is going to have 3D and TV’s and Receivers in mid 2010 will start coming out supporting 3D and HDMI 1.4. So eventually home 3D Blu-ray will be common and I’m sure Avatar will be an early release for it.
Do you know the scheme home TVs will use for 3D? I suppose I should check wikipedia.
Is that a color wheel you’re talking about or a polarizing-filter wheel?
So far the home ones I’ve seen have been LCD shutter tech. I have a feeling that’ll probably stay the standard since I’m not sure if any non-multiple-projector system will be able to polarize the light. A color system may work if Dolby gets on it though.
There might even be multiple but compatible with Blu-ray types. We’ll see.
Lord of the Rings was a masterpiece in good vs. evil........in my lifetime, there will never be another one like it.
From what I've read of Avatar, well, screw it.........
Michael Medved comes to mind.......his should be good
....and homo. Not that that's a bad thing.
Ebert is married. And he’s been known to babble on about gratuitous female nudity in films.
Ebert’s a lib extremist.
Did Soros fund part of the film?
He’s making wads of cash on all the destruction Obama is doing, so I figure in brainwashing out kids with this film, I figure he’s profiting.
So was my ex-neighbor's ex-boyfriend who happened to have two daughters........My neighbor was a guy.
Ebert just seems like a garden variety Democrat. James Cameron is one of the few people who could get a film like this financed on his own.
Ebert is a Scientologist and married another Scientologist because he could not be gay and in the Church....al la Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Marilu Henner....and the list goes on.... The Church is like the Mob and ‘protects’ many of Hollywood’s gays...for a price....
Yup, me too. If Ebert likes it, I know it’s junk.
Where do you get that information? Ebert is Catholic and is not a Hollywood figure. As a critic he stands outside of the industry. He resides in Chicago all year long.
That’s a lot of great stuff you’re missing out on over the years.
I’m not much of a movie fan, so there’s little loss IMO. Just curious, what movies would you put in that category?
Just common sense. He’s been at it since the late 1960s. Hence he’s reccomended a lot of classics over the years.
Ah.
I lived and worked in Hollywood for a long time...he is a well known Scientol there. Many Hollywood figures ‘moonlight’ with other religions but pay homage...so to speak to Scientol.
As I said, he lives in Chicago. He’s very vocal about being a Chicagoan. I don’t know what they would know about him in California. I also live in Chicago and have never heard anything about that. He’s stated that he disdains ‘New Age’ beliefs and calls himself a Secular Humanist. I think you’re mistaking him with someone else.
Heard a report on NPR this morning about a process that can turn any 2D movie into 3D. Titanic’s producer, James Cameron, plans to produce a 3D version of Titanic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.