Skip to comments.
Windows 7 Compatible...No, Really This Time
pcworld ^
| September 30, 2009
Posted on 09/30/2009 10:48:19 PM PDT by JoeProBono
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: JoeProBono
MSnbc right? I think they need to get their heads out of their *ss and then focus on software.
2
posted on
09/30/2009 10:53:48 PM PDT
by
freestyle
To: freestyle
If Vista won’t support XP stuff, will Win 7 support both? Or, will ya have to buy new printers, etc all over again?
3
posted on
09/30/2009 10:59:48 PM PDT
by
umgud
(Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
To: JoeProBono
The first of many mistakes with the launch of Windows Vista was the widespread lack of compatible drivers for critical devices like printers.
***************
I don’t get it, why even change the device model? Why not keep compatibility with ALL XP devices?
4
posted on
09/30/2009 11:00:59 PM PDT
by
ROTB
("By any means necessary"=EvilExcusd "The urge 2 save humanity is [often a ruse] for the urge 2 rule")
To: umgud
If Vista wont support XP stuff, will Win 7 support both? Or, will ya have to buy new printers, etc all over again?
Actually with Windows 7 you get a virtual version of Windows XP so you can still run everything you have in that window.
5
posted on
09/30/2009 11:10:23 PM PDT
by
microgood
To: umgud
Don’t bet the rent money on this, but it is my understanding that 7 will support a ‘virtual XP” environment, if you have the extra memory and hard disk space to support it.
6
posted on
09/30/2009 11:18:29 PM PDT
by
DGHoodini
(Iran Azadi!)
To: microgood
I’ve been using Windows 7 since January. There is no special “window” to run XP programs in, Win 7 is backwards compatible, just like Vista was.
7
posted on
09/30/2009 11:20:15 PM PDT
by
Blue Highway
("Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself" Barack Obama, Oct 15, 2008 Presidential debate)
To: microgood
Hey, you can do that with a Mac!
What a concept.
8
posted on
09/30/2009 11:20:27 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(A mob of one.)
To: microgood
Gee, why didn’t Microcrap do that with XP for previous versions of windows, would have save a bunch of people mucho de niro in the form of printers, scanners, graphic accelerators, sound cards, etc, etc.
9
posted on
09/30/2009 11:21:56 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
To: The Cajun
10
posted on
09/30/2009 11:22:34 PM PDT
by
Blue Highway
("Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself" Barack Obama, Oct 15, 2008 Presidential debate)
To: Blue Highway
Do you have Win 7 Home Premium? I too had heard that Win 7 would have an XP window. I went to Microsoft’w website tonight and on their ‘compare the versions’ page for Win 7, supposedly Win 7 Pro and Win 7 Ultimate do not have the ability to run ‘many xp programs’ (microsoft’s phrasing so they can weasel out if your XP programs don’t run) but that Home Premium does not support XP programs.
Here’s the ‘compare the versions’ page I referred to:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/compare-editions/default.aspx
To: microgood
I heard MSFT does not include it in the lower end versions of Windows 7. MSFT will screw it up again. Just bring back XP and XP Pro.
12
posted on
09/30/2009 11:31:07 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
To: Blue Highway
GREED LOL, I kind of suspected that. Particularly still pissed about having to give up my legal paper size perfectly functioning HP scanner. HP said no problems running it with XP, they lied. Myself and several thousand HP scanner users can attest to that.
13
posted on
09/30/2009 11:31:26 PM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
To: ransomnote
If that is the case then it will be another failure like Vitsa. They should have kept XP and XP Pro.
MSFT is a major fail like Obama.
14
posted on
09/30/2009 11:33:17 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
To: The Cajun
Gee, why didnt Microcrap do that with XP for previous versions of windows, would have save a bunch of people mucho de niro in the form of printers, scanners, graphic accelerators, sound cards, etc, etc.
Your answered your own question.
To: ransomnote; roamer_1
What’s your perspective, roamer?
16
posted on
09/30/2009 11:36:25 PM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: The Cajun
Hmmmm
I think I have one of those . . . it won’t run with Win 7?
17
posted on
09/30/2009 11:37:33 PM PDT
by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Blue Highway
To: DGHoodini
Dont bet the rent money on this, but it is my understanding that 7 will support a virtual XP environment, if you have the extra memory and hard disk space to support it. Well hopefully. I don't think the beta does though. Perhaps they can virtually make the software at least as good as XP is. lol
I don't think devices should be an issue in 7... well, I hope not.
To: ransomnote
I have the beta copy of Ultimate. It simply is not true that it won’t run XP programs. Heck I am running Photoshop 5.5 which was before Windows 98SE and it is running fine.
20
posted on
09/30/2009 11:44:10 PM PDT
by
Blue Highway
("Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself" Barack Obama, Oct 15, 2008 Presidential debate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson