Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Housing complex owners vote to ban smoking
Leader-Telegram (WI) ^ | Julian Emerson

Posted on 07/20/2009 10:29:56 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Old Professer

Never smoked, at least not more than the occasional cigar or cigarette with friends.


41 posted on 07/20/2009 1:31:08 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Go have a pop while you can.

After the breathalyzer ignitions are standard and mandatory equipment, even that pleasure will be denied you, unless you have a favorite establishment close enough to walk to.


42 posted on 07/20/2009 1:31:15 PM PDT by swarthyguy (MEAT, the new tobacco. Your right to eat meat ends where my planetary ecosystem begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

I do not believe the Gov’t has the right to tell private biz owners that they may not allow smoking on their premises.

But what if I walked up to you in public and blew disgusting fumes in your face. Could I legitimately say it’s my “right?”

People should not smoke in public out of RESPECT for others. If you smoke outdoors where other people are, you are full of DISRESPECT for others.


43 posted on 07/20/2009 1:36:53 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

Before filters became common on cigarettes you never saw the litter from them because the paper would give way under rain and wind and the tobacco would scatter, blend in with the grass and decompose.

At the peak of the smoking years in America almost 52% of all adults smoked and at least a third of the high school age kids.

The most common litter then was chewing gum wads welded to the sidewalk.

Perfume is no respecter of privacy to an even greater degree than tobacco smoke since its fumes are heavier and diffuse at nose level while tobacco smoke rises slowly and wafts away on the breeze.

Perfume haters have so far not enjoyed the wide support of anti-s as tobacco haters have but if they did, I’d join them.


44 posted on 07/20/2009 1:38:38 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

It’s rare for me to smell someone else’s perfume when I go out (other than my wife’s).

It’s pretty common for me to catch several whiffs of cig smoke, though.

Once can put on perfume where it doesn’t smell more than a foot away from a person.

A smoker, otoh, cannot contain his smoke. One smoker could literally bother dozens of people at once.


45 posted on 07/20/2009 1:40:52 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

You’re not an idiot, do you ever spend the night away from home?


46 posted on 07/20/2009 1:41:13 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

OK, OK, Americans are offended by everything these days.

So, you got smokers banned in private establishments and now you want it banned outside.

Fine, I agreed with you and offer some words of encouragemnt as I already did - fret not, Oh easily offended one, public smoking bans outdoors are almost here.


47 posted on 07/20/2009 1:41:23 PM PDT by swarthyguy (MEAT, the new tobacco. Your right to eat meat ends where my planetary ecosystem begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

Read my posts...I am not for Govt bans in private establishments.

But, like I said, smokers dig their own graves due to their behavior. Sorry, but you do not have a right to blow cig smoke in my face.


48 posted on 07/20/2009 1:44:10 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

>you do not have a right to blow cig smoke in my face.

you do not have a right to drive as often as you want.

Your exhaust is stinking up my planet.

you do not have a right to eat animal based protein products.

Your desire to eat meat is destroying my planet.

you do not have a right to heat or cool your house to your comfort.

Your excessive use of energy is polluting my living planet.

Enjoy the future.


49 posted on 07/20/2009 1:47:09 PM PDT by swarthyguy (MEAT, the new tobacco. Your right to eat meat ends where my planetary ecosystem begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
I don't like cigarette smoke, but I'm not going to infringe on someone else's LIBERTY to smoke in their own home.. It doesn't matter if it's a detached home, townhouse or condo.. It's the principle!

The other day I passed a house with all the windows open. A strong smell of cigarettes emanated from it .. Are they next? Will towns get into the act and ban all homeowners from smoking in their own home?

It's not about cigarettes.. It's about the BIG picture Liberals tend to overlook.. It's about our LIBERTY being chipped away.. If that doesn't scare you it should.
50 posted on 07/20/2009 1:55:15 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("To anger a Conservative, lie to him.. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

Fair. But some people choose to voluntarily give up some of their liberty to a HOA to ensure they don’t have to deal with externalities like that. This HOA did just that, and it sounds like it didn’t even directly affect any of the people currently living there.

I care when government takes away my liberty, not when people voluntarily give it up through contracts. People sign contracts giving up their liberty all the time (job contracts, promises to buy or provide a service, etc.) and this is not a problem if they are freely making these decisions.


51 posted on 07/20/2009 2:03:50 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo
Fair. But some people choose to voluntarily give up some of their liberty to a HOA

Four homeowners are against it. Something like that should be unanimous.

Let's ban Music in homes.. No music ever because I might hear 'Air Supply' and that really would make me ill!
52 posted on 07/20/2009 2:35:21 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("To anger a Conservative, lie to him.. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts

No need for a HOA if you require unanimity. The whole point of a HOA is people agree to give up some of their rights, and occasionally submit to rules they don’t support, because in general they believe this will improve life and protect the value of their homes.

They do this in advance, knowing they might be forced to obey rules they don’t vote for.


53 posted on 07/20/2009 2:40:10 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Arguendo

I don’t see how smoking (a legal activity) in their own homes.. with the doors and windows shut.. could be enforced. If they are so concerned about smoke.. ALL smoke..even grilling inside/outside your home should be banned from the neighborhood.. The smoke from grilling is far more intrusive than a random whiff of someone’s second hand smoke. I’d fight it in court.


54 posted on 07/20/2009 2:59:41 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("To anger a Conservative, lie to him.. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Can you imagine having to go outside for a cigarette in an Eau Clair, WI winter ?


55 posted on 07/20/2009 3:02:57 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

None of what you say I do is based in fact.

I never said you couldn’t smoke. I just said please practice some common courtesy and refrain from blowing it in my face.


56 posted on 07/20/2009 3:07:10 PM PDT by Boiling Pots (Barack Obama: The final turd George W. Bush laid on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
I don’t see how smoking (a legal activity) in their own homes.. with the doors and windows shut.. could be enforced.

Well if there's no way for anyone to smell it, I guess it can't be. But if the smoke does in fact seep through the walls and the neighbors can smell it, and they choose to complain, then obviously it can be enforced.

I don't see on what grounds the court could refuse to enforce it. They signed a contract saying they would follow HOA rules or (probably) the HOA could fine them, and if they break those rules there's no reason the court could refuse to enforce the fine.

57 posted on 07/20/2009 3:15:47 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Because of their close proximity, smoke from one unit could flow into the one next door.

Has this every actually happened to anyone who wasn't living in some kind of ramshackle apartment building or fleabag hotel?

I suppose SOME amount of tobacco smoke will seep through even properly-constructed walls but is it enough for anyone to be worried about? There are going to be minute traces of toxic material in any home in an urban or suburban area. Why do people care that much if .000000000001% of their neighbors tobacco smoke is added to the mix?

58 posted on 07/20/2009 3:28:25 PM PDT by timm22 (Think critically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
BTW, here is a famous case on a similar issue. If a HOA is allowed to ban cats, which usually have virtually no impact on neighboring condos, then one can certainly get away with banning smoking.
59 posted on 07/20/2009 3:29:05 PM PDT by Arguendo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Boiling Pots

You will see how the logic of the antitabak crowd regarding smoking will be used to limit all other kinds of activities and living in general.

That’s what I was trying to point out.

Ben Franklin was correct, we are all gonna hang seperately.


60 posted on 07/20/2009 3:43:23 PM PDT by swarthyguy (MEAT, the new tobacco. Your right to eat meat ends where my planetary ecosystem begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson