Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Capitalism Christian?
Is Capitalism Christian? | 1985 | Franky Schaeffer

Posted on 07/19/2009 8:24:21 AM PDT by newheart

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: newheart
" In the end, it may not be possible to give a definitive answer..."

If you're not familiar with God's word, I suppose, but to a Bible reader, its obvious: a free economy can only spring from the gospel of Jesus Christ.

41 posted on 07/19/2009 3:23:27 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

And the socialists wish to purge II Thessalonians from the Bible.


42 posted on 07/19/2009 3:24:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Thanks GW!


43 posted on 07/19/2009 3:25:21 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
"Why use the word “Capitalism?” It was invented by Marx.
Isn’t there a better word for 'the freedom of individiduals to keep their own property'?"

Yes, its simply called Freedom. - We do need to stop allowing any socialist to define any term; they are dishonest, greedy, slothful, and hate-driven.

44 posted on 07/19/2009 3:29:25 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newheart
"Actually the word 'capitalist' predates Marx by a half-century or so."

No, not in the sense in which he uses it.

45 posted on 07/19/2009 3:31:36 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

“While it (capitalism) is not an equalizer, it was never intended to be.”

I agree that free enterprise (capitalism) was not intended to be an equalizer. However, I think that over time the equal opportunity of free enterprise will tend toward equal results. I don’t think business acumen is inherited. The children and grandchildren of accomplished entrepreneurs will fritter away much of their wealth. Ted Kennedy may be augmenting his wealth, but it is due to his influence as a senator in influencing legislation that benefits his businesses. In other words, it due to government corruption. Ditto for the Clintons and for Hussein Obama.


46 posted on 07/19/2009 3:47:29 PM PDT by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: newheart
. . . but their expressed desire is for a more fair, equitable and just system.

Expressing this desire is what they do to mask their avarice, so as to fool themselves and their friends. When you say often, you suggest that you do ascertain an individual's motivations. This is what prompts my question.

47 posted on 07/19/2009 5:30:36 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Capitalism is no better or worse than the citizens who employ it as a system of commerce. Socialism, on the other hand, is always worse as a system than the collective sum of its people. Human beings deserve better than the endless gray and dreary grindstone to which Socialistic systems harness people. Creativity, freedom, growth, beauty, and the use of ones' talents have a legitimate and crucial role, even in a fallen world.
For 'capitalism' read 'free markets'.
48 posted on 07/19/2009 6:30:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
When you say often, you suggest that you do ascertain an individual's motivations.

Sorry, I just tend to take people at their word. Call me naive.

49 posted on 07/19/2009 8:06:07 PM PDT by newheart (Obama. We kind of underestimated the creepiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
This seems to be the basis on which "politics" moves these days. In short, as far away as possible from the idea of capitalism as both the foundation and expression of fruitful human liberty.

Indeed. Thank you for your wonderful essay-post, dearest sister in Christ!

50 posted on 07/19/2009 9:44:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson