Skip to comments.
Mayo reports dramatic outcomes in prostate cancer study
MinnPost.com ^
| Jun 19 2009 1
| Susan Perry
Posted on 06/19/2009 5:01:05 PM PDT by Daffynition
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Daffynition
Excellent news!
Thanks for posting!
2
posted on
06/19/2009 5:06:39 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: Daffynition
3
posted on
06/19/2009 5:09:20 PM PDT
by
Covenantor
("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
To: Daffynition
4
posted on
06/19/2009 5:09:34 PM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: Daffynition
I hope they hurry up and get every cure they can to market ASAP. Soon, R&D may vanish due to socialism choking innovation out of the market.
5
posted on
06/19/2009 5:24:19 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Daffynition
It will be labeled “Unavailable” to those that eat government cheese.
6
posted on
06/19/2009 5:29:54 PM PDT
by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: KoRn
It won’t matter if they get it to market before Obama-care is in place.
It will simply be deemed “too expensive” to distribute if you’re not “in the ruling class”. And, as in Canada, private clinics will be illegal.
7
posted on
06/19/2009 5:32:17 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(ObamaCare = "DYING IN LINE!")
To: randog
>> It will be labeled Unavailable to those that eat government cheese.
And, hey, pretty soon, who WON’T be eating government cheese?
Even if you don’t WANT government cheese, it will be rammed down your throat.
Resistance will be futile.
And the cheese will be moldy, anyway...
8
posted on
06/19/2009 5:43:42 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: G Larry
>> It will simply be deemed too expensive to distribute if youre not in the ruling class.
Yeah, soon, the only ones that will be eligible to have their prostate cancer cured will be Pelosi, Hillary, and Debbie Stabenow.
9
posted on
06/19/2009 5:44:50 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
To: Daffynition
Under HusseinCare, these pts would most likely not have been approved for the experimental treatments.
Every American at some point in their lives will face a medical crisis.
Or have one of their loved ones facing a medical crisis.
If Obama and the Democrat Party get their way-
prayer and back alley home remedies will be their only recourse.
To: Nervous Tick
11
posted on
06/19/2009 5:49:05 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Daffynition
"and the tenacious insistence of the wife of one of the patients"
This is the part that gets me. Usually removal of the prostate means that the man has to pee in a diaper, and is "non-functional", if you get my drift.
Methinks she had an ulterior motive...
12
posted on
06/19/2009 5:55:32 PM PDT
by
hunter112
(SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
To: Daffynition
Posted on the same day as the death of Gary Papa, longtime sportscaster for Philadelphia's ABC channel 6, who battled prostate cancer for five years. Bald as a result of his chemo and often in "excruciating pain", he continued his regular sports reporting on and off 'til as late as May 13 of this year, and appeared on air just last week to help advertise this Sunday's "Race 4 Your Life", the annual Father's Day marathon for prostate cancer research which he had been championing for seven years. Always positive and smiling, a favorite of fans and sports figures alike, he was only 54. Some day approaches like the one in this article will put and end to the terrible disease of prostate cancer and the kind of sadness which lies over Philly town tonight......
RIP, Gary Papa.....
To: Daffynition
Not only could they not find cancer outside the prostate, they couldnt find it inside either. Pretty incredible.
To: Intolerant in NJ
For all those for which this possible cure came to late, including Gary Papa, let us hope. Let us hope.
15
posted on
06/20/2009 2:25:38 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
("If any of you die, can I please have your ammo?" ~ Gator113)
To: Nervous Tick
Even if you dont WANT government cheese, it will be rammed down your throat. "When the revolution comes, everyone will eat peaches and cream!"
"But I don't like peaches and cream."
"When the revolution comes, you WILL like peaches and cream!"
16
posted on
06/20/2009 2:52:55 AM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: hunter112
This is the part that gets me. Usually removal of the prostate means that the man has to pee in a diaper, and is "non-functional", if you get my drift. Methinks she had an ulterior motive... I doubt it. Simply because there is another surgical procedure that can sometimes stop the cancer especially the slower less aggressive variant. The prostate is left intact and the means of producing testosterone is removed instead which causes no bladder ill effects. Even at that the body still produces a certain amount of testosterone and that is what Prostate Cancer feeds on. Thankfully more research is being done and more knowledge gained.
17
posted on
06/20/2009 3:17:38 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgement? Which one say ye?)
To: Daffynition
...But the pathologist came back saying he couldnt find the cancer, says Kwon. They ended up removing the prostate. Not only could they not find cancer outside the prostate, they couldnt find it inside either....Ok, they lost me. If there was no cancer, why remove the prostate?
18
posted on
06/20/2009 1:09:53 PM PDT
by
FReepaholic
(Jump You F**kers!)
To: FReepaholic
They had to remove it in order to tear it to pieces and find out if there was any cancer inside. Remember that they'd never seen any treatment succeed in completely eliminating prostate cancer before, plus
When Blute opened the patient on the operating table, he saw a lot of blanched scar tissue usually a sign of advanced cancer. He sent tissue samples to the pathology lab (standard procedure) and, while waiting for the results, went out to prepare the patients family for what he was sure was going to be bad news.So when they first looked inside, things looked bad, as if there had been (or still was) widespread cancer. Even though the surrounding tissue came back negative for cancer (apparently before the prostate was actually removed, though that isn't entirely clear), it still seemed extremely unlikely that the interior of the prostate -- the original source of the cancer -- was completely cancer-free.
To: GovernmentShrinker
Bump!
20
posted on
06/20/2009 1:39:54 PM PDT
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife ) (Who will lead us?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson