Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Seagate Replica PC Backup Appliance Makes Data Backup And Recovery Effortless
Seagate ^ | April 27, 2009 | Press Releases

Posted on 04/27/2009 9:11:18 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I would assume this is a Windows offering.....but so far can't verify that.
1 posted on 04/27/2009 9:11:18 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Did find this ...for Linux interest:

Seagate Surfaces With New Linux NAS Offerings

****************************EXCERPT***********************

Posted by Matthew McKenzie Thursday, Mar 26, 2009, 02:39 AM ET

Small businesses looking for cheap, reliable storage solutions now have another interesting option to ponder, courtesy of Seagate.

There are a number of network-attached storage (NAS) products on the market that are suitable for smaller businesses. But this was a market where Seagate, one of the world's biggest storage hardware vendors, had been conspicuously absent -- until now.

With its BlackArmor NAS product line, Seagate is re-introducing a brand it acquired after purchasing Maxtor back in 2006. The BlackArmor NAS 440, at the top of Seagate's new NAS lineup, supports up to four 2TB hot-swappable drives. Its Linux-based firmware allows users to set up RAID 0/1/5/10 or JBOD options and supports full-system backups, bare-metal restores, and data encryption, among other management features.

LinuxDevices.com has a more detailed summary of the BlackArmor NAS, including some photos. Purchase information, including PDF data sheets, are available at Seagate's Web site.

It looks like the BlackArmor NAS will be a great deal right out of the gate: A NAS 440 equipped with four 2TB drives will retail for around $2,000, and less expensive models will sell for as little as $600. According to Seagate, the BlackArmor NAS is suitable for use in business environments with up to 50 desktop users, depending on the model and amount of storage.


2 posted on 04/27/2009 9:14:31 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Of course. You don’t need to back up Macs.


3 posted on 04/27/2009 9:18:06 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I would assume this is a Windows offering.....but so far can't verify that.

It's intended only for Vista and XP.

The data sheet is here.

4 posted on 04/27/2009 9:19:36 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I have to admit, what I, as a consumer, would really love, would be a backup system that was intelligent enough to do the following: Reinstall the base operating system and applications as installed. Maintain a constant archive of digital photos and created documents. And be able to restore both sets onto a computer in less than an hour, permitting me to flush the system on a semi-regular basis.

Instead, what I'm offered is a series of backup systems that back up everything, and if I want to restore, it'll put me right back to the point that caused the need for the restore in the first place, with no intelligence in file or data selection.

I know as a user that the answer's pretty simple, make sure that I do this myself, putting photos, videos and documents in a specific folder chain, backing that up regularly, and create a drive image after installing all needed software on a vanilla system. The problem is that the time I'm least willing and most time impacted is after spending hours and hours installing the operating system and applications.

I can have a vague hope that Seagate has finally addressed this pressing need in the market, but I suspect, from the press release, that once again, they've simply made a new variation of whole system mirroring, resulting in hours long restore processes that simply put the system back to the point it was unstable.

5 posted on 04/27/2009 9:21:15 AM PDT by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797; EggsAckley; hedgetrimmer; jahp; TwilightDog
Cruzio
Send FReepmail if you want on/off the Santa Cruz County CA ping list
Click for Santa Cruz, California Forecast
The List of Ping Lists

SCOTTS VALLEY REPRESENTIN' YO

6 posted on 04/27/2009 9:27:16 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

7 posted on 04/27/2009 9:27:38 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"eliminates the need to manually learn, manage, or dedicate any time to the backup process" is just sales-speak for "we give the user no control over our program".
8 posted on 04/27/2009 9:30:29 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Yea...right....hard drives just don’t fail in macs right?


9 posted on 04/27/2009 9:31:19 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Seagate also announced this earlier:

Seagate debuts low-power Barracuda LP 3.5" hard drives

*******************************EXXCERPT*************************

It’s Earth Day today, so what better day for Seagate to roll out a new green range of 3.5″ desktop hard drives.

The Barracuda LP comes in 1TB, 1.5TB and 2TB capacities and feature 32MB of cache.

The Barracuda LP has two tricks up its sleeve:

Given the capacities of these drives I expect we’ll see them in NAS boxes and external hard drives before they make their way into PCs. Lower power consumption means less heat, and less heat to have to deal with translates into greater reliability.

10 posted on 04/27/2009 9:31:30 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander; All

Thanks....nice Photo in the PDF document....very attractive ...especially for laptop lovers.


11 posted on 04/27/2009 9:34:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Sometimes I’m shocked when reminded that there actually IS some industry in this county.

LOL


12 posted on 04/27/2009 9:35:57 AM PDT by EggsAckley ("There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply." W.C Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It’s Earth Day today, so what better day for Seagate to roll out a new green range of 3.5″ desktop hard drives.

I think I'm gonna be ill. If it's green, let Al Gore stick it where there's no carbon footprint.

13 posted on 04/27/2009 9:36:59 AM PDT by McGruff (I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of "bow" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Yeah, it’s a minor miracle that any businesses choose to operate at all in the Peoples Republic Of Cruzio.

Although it seems that the level of service (at least w/regards to home repair) here is considerably less than in Santa Cara County. We could use a good plumber.

The poor landowner of the parcel where a proposed Target was to be built is now facing foreclosure by the very city gub’mint that dragged its feet in permitting the store to be built there.


14 posted on 04/27/2009 9:42:15 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Well they have a special deal for Macs with Firewire:

Seagate FreeAgent XTreme ST315005FPA2E3-RK 1.5TB 7200 RPM USB 2.0 / IEEE 1394a / eSATA Black External Hard Drive - Retail

And since it has eSaATA I could use it too,...but I already have a nice setup.

15 posted on 04/27/2009 9:47:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

Mac’s don’t die, they just evolve. If a Mac won’t boot it is really telling you don’t want to do what you were about to do.


16 posted on 04/27/2009 9:56:38 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

home


17 posted on 04/27/2009 10:05:08 AM PDT by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Just like any other OPERATING SYSTEM.....it is completely transparent to the hardware....a hard drive could care less what is stored on it, when one goes it goes.....


18 posted on 04/27/2009 10:13:55 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Sounds like what you really want is a unix system. User information is automatically separated from system data and programs. When I backup my boxes at home, all I do is rsync /home to the external backup device. Because my /home partition is on it's own drive, I can do a complete reload of my box when I do an OS upgrade, yet still maintain all of my user preferences and data without even having to restore anything. The 'time machine' program on a Mac also does an excellent job of preserving user data history.

Where you run into problems, is the registry on windows boxes, where system and user data is commingled such that restoring one or the other separately is difficult, if not impossible.

19 posted on 04/27/2009 10:32:28 AM PDT by zeugma (Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
What I'd like to know is if it is configurable if you WANT to have control.

Example: What is the time frame between the oldest checkpoint and the newest? Personally, I'd like to set up a great many days between oldest and newest to give me the ability to effectively recover from a virus infection that I didn't notice for say...3-4 days. Since the oldest checkpoint 'rolls off', I want control of that time frame.
Or is it set with a default setting that cannot be increased?

20 posted on 04/27/2009 11:24:39 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I'd rather be hated for who I am than loved for something I ain't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson