UFO or not UFO? Area 51 declassifying pours cold water on theory..

The Tech Herald ^ | April 12th, 2009 | Rich Bowden

[Caramelgal]

You feel you are alive right? What if you are actually dead.

What if I’m alive but just dreaming about the existence of a website named FreeRepublic and some imaginary poster named marbren who is just a figment of my overactive imagination?

Do you still feel alive?

So let’s make a bet. So let’s say you and I both stay home from work tomorrow and see if anyone notices. The first one fired from their job wins!

And being that tomorrow is April 15th, let’s both not file our income tax returns as an exercise to see which one of us are really alive or not. ;),

[Quix]

INDEED.

Though trying to get a naysayer to accept reasonable fact . . .

doesn’t sound very reasonable, to me.

[Quix]

Are you bucking for membership in the group?

[Quix]

I’m not at all convinced that good angels had anything to do with the Pleades.

Certainly God could have arranged things however He chose . . . I just haven’t seen any convincing evidence of that.

[Quix]

I suppose it’s technically true about some folks . . . though I don’t recall meeting anyone like that on these threads.

There’s lots of stuff that doesn’t meet my criteria for fact, truth etc. in the subject area.

[Quix]

However,

if you’re itching to be considered a naysayer, I’m sure we could oblige without tons of trouble.

[Quix]

Naw.

In terms of the well vetted cases . . .

Occam’s razor is on our side.

Most Truly scientific, rational folks recognize that readily.

[marbren]

I am self employed. Taxes are filed and refund spent.

[TaraP]

Yes I see your point...

I am going to read more about that one!

[Quix]

Thar ya go agin . . .

WRONG.

Editor-surveyor . . . has no NEED to prove any such thing to any naysayer, per se.

He may do so for jollies or indulging silly folks or for temporary amusement, however.

[Quix]

Now ES, be kind

logic is not their forte.

/s

[TaraP]

Great! Need to be refreshed for another round with naysayers!

[Quix]

I don’t recall . . . in the last 10 years on FR . . .

any serious naysayer

ever

learning much from any serious evidence . . . logical, scientific, solid, multi-sourced . . . or whatever.

Their capacities to make excuses for their rigid narrow biases to remain unphased is truly Olympian.

[Quix]

NOPE.

Some naysayers have convoluted things here and there in some minor areas to occasionally leave such an impression for the easily impressionable.

[stockpirate]

Those type of mindless idiots sometimes just, well I think you know what I mean.

[TaraP]

What proof are you looking for?

Do you really think if the Gov’t had an Alien in there custody they would be so revealing to expose him on CNN or Fox?

[Quix]

There’s no evidence that the Roswell crash critters were hybrids.

[Quix]

Ahhhhhhhhh but naysayers tend to consider

THEMSELVES

to be the paragon intellects and everyone else mental gnats.

[Quix]

There’s all kinds of stories about

GOOD “races” of “ET’s”

But imho, sooner or later . . . other sources assert convincingly that all such are seen to be in the cooperative company of baddies.

I don’t believe that any of the crop of ET’s of the last 60 years are anything ABOVE fallen angels. They may be lower than or equal to. I don’t believe any of them are above that level of critter.

My own bias from all I’ve read.

BTW, what’s so . . . psychologically difficult for naysayers to note that they have incredible biases?

I know. I know. I’m the psychologist. LOL.

[Quix]

Not sure how many rounds I’m up for.

I need to write a satire on:

CHILD ABUSE IN CHURCH

vis a vis music volume being equal to snowmobiles, pneumatic drills etc.

Sigh. GRRRR.