Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
Do you mean if zero try to push the, ahem, "fairness doctrine" he could take him to court and file for a discovery of his eligibility status??
What if congress does it?
I'd give my ***** to see that.
You said — “Okay, we get it now (LOL) Asking the POTUS to be Constitutionally fit is a conspiracy. When there is justifiable doubts and he’s asked to prove it with a lousy piece of paper to the country he is in charge of, he spends money to keep it sealed. We wonder why, and we’re kooks.”
Look at Post #153. And then look at Post #176. That explains a bit.
Now, once again, to make it clear, I argued for the documentation to be produced prior to the election. But, it didn’t make any difference, because Obama won and I lost (along with other conservatives). And then, in watching several court cases (even before the elections), it was clear that the courts were not going to do something on the basis of Internet allegations and accusations, without any proof of any kind. Furthermore, it was apparent that the “process” that Obama went through was the same process that all other Presidential candidates went through — which showed that there was a “hole in the process” of vetting a candidate.
That meant that the hole in the process had to be closed up, hence... the reason why I advocated requiring by law proof of documentation in state laws (like Oklahoma and Arizona are doing).
Now, for those *in denial* of these things (which are “in reality”) — they are part of the Obama Derangement Syndrome, which leads to all sorts of weird and funny ideas, like the US Marshal escorting Obama out of the White House, or the U.S. Military surrounding the White House with tanks. That’s all part of the Obama Derangement Syndrome.
The “conspiracy theories” are when those who *expect* a judge to order Obama out of the White House and send a U.S. Marshal over there to do it — find out that a judge won’t do it (because it’s not Constitutional... LOL...) — then they say it’s because the judges are all supporting and protecting Obama (hence, the “conspiracy”...).
—
And then you said — “And I almost forgot, LOL If we are kooks in your book, I wonder what that makes you?”
Well, I would say a “realist” — just like the Oklahoma legislator who put forth the bill in Oklahoma to “vet the candidate” by requiring specific documentation (which would be required of Obama, too). Now, I was saying that before *any state* had put forth any bill like that. And now two states are doing it. The legislator in Oklahoma is one that is nearby and I support, too, being in Broken Arrow. I’m in Tulsa.
Again, it’s called “realism” — in that Obama *is* President — contrary to others of the Obama Derangement Syndrome — who actually persist (to this day, at least some of them...) saying that Obama *really isn’t the President*. Talk about “deranged” — that is the definition of it...
—
And lastly you said — “C’mon, on the level, how much do you make to come here and spout your bilge, line after line after line? Not to mention your condescending naturally abrasive tone, you get extra points or money for that?”
Now — with this statement — we’re entering into the “conspiracy phase” of this conversation... LOL... This is a *prime example* of it. You provided the exact proof of what I was saying...
In short, I’ve never been paid, never been asked to do it, am not part of anything related to Obama, not part of the DU, never posted over there, am a decades and decades old Republican, won’t vote for a Democrat, campaigned against Obama and so on and so forth.
But — thanks for providing the “evidence” of the “conspiracy theory” at work on Free Republic....
I’m ignoring you
After all my explanations? I guess they didn’t go over very well...
Have you considered that your creds are extremely weak since your past deceit has been exposed, yet again?
I see people walking down the street at times, hollering to themselves and a few times I’ve been on the bus, there are sometimes people talking to an empty seat, next to them...
Sometimes you just can’t help deranged people who don’t want to be helped...
What can I say..., I can’t help everyone...
You act like a liberal. Cases in point.
Here you are in recent posts that take the contrary points of view.
In this post, you are squawking about that two liberal Senators are defending the F-22 production line. It's certainly not because they are defense hawks. Would Kennedy and Kerry take the same position if Bush was still President? Kerry is a guy who opposed just about every major weapon acquisition over the last quarter century.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2192987/posts?page=2#2
And here in this post of yours you point out that Obama wants to keep the Bush administration emails private. You sarcastically say "the Obama Administration is against everything that Bush did... LOL." Is it because Obama feels a kinship toward Bush? No, it's because Obama feels it's in his best interests to do so most likely for unmagnanimous reasons that has little to do with his stated policy of transparency.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2190935/posts?page=4#4
And in this post of yours, it appears you are deflecting blame from Obama and putting it all on Bush for the stock market and recession. As you state it was all "smoke and mirrors of the last decade or so..."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2192998/posts?page=14#14
It's a consistent theme from you to mitigate or obfuscate issues for the Democrats.
What happened to the posters account?
It seems this account has been banned or suspended.
Why would FR ban this guy, was it just for this post?
Looks like Jackofhearts has been banned from FR.
ping..
You said — “You act like a liberal. Cases in point.”
You’re working mighty hard to “prove” I’m a liberal... LOL.. I’ve already made the issue very clear. Liberals don’t vote Republican, as I have. Liberals don’t oppose Obama as I have. Liberals, in fact, stay as far away from issues of the Bible and supporting it, as I have.
The only reason why you’re trying so desperately to say that I’m a liberal is basically because I post here that I don’t go along with the Obama Derangement Syndrome and I don’t go along with the “conspiracy theories” that circulate around that syndrome — and am still a conservative.
You figure that everyone who is a conservative must belong to the Obama Derangement Syndrome. In order to *maintain* that stance — you must prove that anyone who doesn’t adhere to the Obama Derangement Syndrome is a liberal.
And you certainly do work might hard at it... LOL...
—
Okay on to the other stuff...
You referred to — “In this post, you are squawking about that two liberal Senators are defending the F-22 production line. It’s certainly not because they are defense hawks. Would Kennedy and Kerry take the same position if Bush was still President? Kerry is a guy who opposed just about every major weapon acquisition over the last quarter century.”
You don’t like my humor in that the Democrats have “come over” to the Republican view of things...
It’s amazing that some people are “so, so defensive” about anything “Democrat” that they cannot even mention the fact that any Democrat ever supported a thing that a Republican did. Oh well..., I’m not that defensive. If a Democrat does — I laugh about it... :-)
—
And the next thing you said — “And here in this post of yours you point out that Obama wants to keep the Bush administration emails private. You sarcastically say “the Obama Administration is against everything that Bush did... LOL.” Is it because Obama feels a kinship toward Bush? No, it’s because Obama feels it’s in his best interests to do so most likely for unmagnanimous reasons that has little to do with his stated policy of transparency.”
Okay, the “article” said the following — “The Obama administration, siding with former President George W. Bush, is trying to kill a lawsuit that seeks to recover what could be millions of missing White House e-mails.”
And I thought that was very humorous — in that the Obama Administration is actually siding with the former Bush Administration. It fits exactly what I was saying before the election — in that the *realities* of the office of President of the United States — tends to modify a candidates behavior. I always did think that once candidates “got into office” that they find that things are not as they would first like to think — as a “candidate”.
And it’s quite humorous, for me — to see “Obama” backing the former “Bush Administration”... LOL...
—
And lastly you say — “And in this post of yours, it appears you are deflecting blame from Obama and putting it all on Bush for the stock market and recession. As you state it was all “smoke and mirrors of the last decade or so...”
Now, in this post..., I do think that the underlying problems with the economy is that for years (and even for over a decade or more (going back before the Bush Administration), that the economy was working on “smoke and mirrors”.
And that has been shown to be true — just in the one example of Bernie Madoff. How long has Bernie Madoff been working on the “smoke and mirrors” style of investment with his investors... LOL... (quite a while, I would say).
I don’t think this has anything to do with a *strict political agenda* — as much as it has to do with a lot of “finance guys” (in the financial markets) putting together things are are more and more risky, are more and more dangerous, and are less and less founded (in good solid investing strategies).
And so, yes, I think we’ve come to a point where the “smoke and mirrors” of a lot of this investing and financing has “caught up” with us.
Now, having said all that — don’t you think you’re *working overtime* trying to “prove” I’m a liberal... LOL...
I’ve got to wonder how come I deserve such “extra special treatment” from you... :-)
When you say “sitting on the story”, can I take that to mean they have valid information that he is not eligible?
You asked — “When you say “sitting on the story”, can I take that to mean they have valid information that he is not eligible?”
They banned the poster for a “fake story”....
yep, for this post...
///// #PPPPPPP
DTG 270234Z FEB 09
T O P S E C R E T VIKINGKITTEN
SUBJ: ZOT
RE: POST 1
1. WATCH NCOIC HAS CONFIRMED REPEAT CONFIRMED TROLL SIGHTING, THIS DTG, THIS LOCATION.
2. FR MOD COMMAND HAS INITIATED COMMAND-DIRECTED ZORCH ON TARGET (ZOT).
3. WATCH NCOIC HAS CONCLUDED BATTLE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (BDA) FOLLOWING STRIKE TERMINATION ORDER. BDA EVALUATES STRIKE EFFECT AS LEVEL-ONE “ROOM TEMP”.
4. ALL ELEMENTS ARE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE OPTION “DOGPILE” UPON RECEIPT OF THIS MSG. GENERAL ORDER ONE IS SUSPENDED THIS OCCASION.
5. ALL ELEMENTS ARE DIRECTED TO RALLY POINT URSULA FOR AFTER-ACTION REVIEW (AAR) AND AUTHORIZED MINUET UPON TROLL REMAINS. CONSUMPTION OF ADULT BEVERAGES IS FURTHER ENCOURAGED.
6. CHALLENGE/PASSWORD: SARAH-CUDA.
#/////
NOTHING FOLLOWS
EOM EOM EOM
Thank you.
You can state anything you want here as cover as in I qoute scripture or I vote Republican. I don’t know if you do or not. But what I do know is that you have a common theme in your posts as I pointed out to you in number 187. It’s indicative of your posts in general.
There’s no such thing as “Obama Derangement Syndrome” as it pertains his citizenship issue. It’s well established that Obama has covered up his past that could plausibly put “his presidency” in jeopardy.
Lots of zots today.
No Fox news is actually sitting on the story...
I’m being suppressed, my very existence is denied.
While I don’t doubt there is something Bama doesn’t want us to know about his past, history, and birth, I doubt that Murdoch and Fox would be sitting on info if they had solid proof.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.