Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
You said — “You don’t post at Democrat Underground ... using the name Star Traveler. Want to share with us what name you DO use at DU, janx?”
You brought that up before, and I answered it before (and did so now..., again, here on this thread). To make it clear — once again — I (as in “me” the “real person” using *any name* LOL...) — don’t post over there at DU, and never have, at no time in the past, present (and/or will in the future...). I hope I’ve covered all the contingencies and the “bases” here.. :-)
The fact of the matter that you don’t like me referring to certain posters as part of the Obama Derangement Syndrome and I don’t go along with those conspiracy theories that many have and the absolutely crazy ideas about how to get Obama out of office (like some I’ve heard say the military will surround the White House with tanks... LOL...) — leads some of those same posters to try to say I’m part of the liberal crowd or support Obama or am a troll and so on.
But, that’s all not true and I’ve been here campaigning against Obama before the election, but I lost (along with other conservatives). So now we’ve got Obama for President — in spite of the “denial of reality” that those of the Obama Derangement Syndrome engage in.
So, sorry to disappoint you and your eager seeking for a liberal... he doesn’t exist here... still conservative as always...
That’s what I thought — it is okay to insult someone else as long as it’s “you” doing the insulting.... :-)
Typical of the type of thinking for the Obama Derangement Syndrome crowd...
It’s just difficult to believe someone who has lied so blatantly using the story of the Good Samaritan as a prop.
You said — “It’s just difficult to believe someone who has lied so blatantly using the story of the Good Samaritan as a prop.”
Actually, it’s more difficult to believe that you try so hard and yet get nowhere... LOL...
Is that an invitation to post your blatant deceit, again?
You never give up do you? My comment was not an insult to you, using the fact that the poster go zotted had nothing to do with the debate you and I were having. So for you to use it, yes it appears desperate.
If you took it as an insult, perhaps I struck a nerve, for that, maybe you owe yourself an apology.
If you call standing up for the Constitution and demanding zero account for his eligibility ODS, then maybe you'll get along better over at DU
You can try until Kingdom Come and it will still be getting nowhere...
—
I can understand the “mentality” though, as I see it “at work” with the Obama Derangement group, too. They have a desire to “beat their heads against a brick wall” — until bloody. And that makes them think they are getting somewhere...
So..., completely understandable with someone who is in deep denial of reality...
:-)
I don’t go for the “conspiracy crowds” whether over at DU or on Free Republic. But, since I don’t see or post anything at DU, I only get to see what “conspiracies” are posted here...
Bill Cunningham covers the story every week on his nationwide Sunday show. His audience is fairly large. He and Savage are the only two hosts who cover this topic with any regularity. Your take please.
[[ To: MHGinTN; mylife; Admin Moderator
…
{MHGinTN}And then — “You were caught in your deceit when you tried to use the story of the Good Samaritan as if ‘you knew your Bible’, yet you weren’t even familiar enough with the story to know the Good Samaritan’s role in the story. You’re a deceiver.”
{Star Traveler}So you say, but I don’t. …
213 posted on Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:43:04 AM by Star Traveler
So, let’s take a look, to see if you were deceiving readers with your faux Bible lesson!
[Star Traveler: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2154244/posts?q=1&;page=305] You said — “He didn’t say anything about being nice to His enemies.” I think he did, in regards to the question of “Who is my neighbor” and who helped the injured Samaritan along the road (Samaritans were the enemies of Israel...).... I think Jesus made the point very well…
Was this merely a typo? Well, you repeated the error, so we can’t call the initial error a typo; you just aren’t what you pretend to be. But, in typical liars bluff not knowing when to keep quiet in your initial deceit, you tried to dismiss my calling you out:
To: Star Traveler
When you actually learn whom the Samaritans were and their relationship to the ‘in tribe’ of Jerusalem, perhaps you’ll have matured sufficiently to not make large religious claims based on flawed references.
326 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 8:55:48 PM by MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
Suffice it to say, if you studied the Bible and knew your facts …
It appears you have no knowledge of the Bible or knowledge of Jesus, and that’s a major problem in even understanding what Jesus said…
341 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:11:52 PM by Star Traveler
To: MHGinTN
… And Jesus made that an express example of the question of “Who is my neighbor” in giving the example of helping the Samaritan who was passed by on the road, by everyone else. …
You obviously are like the Pharisees and the Sadducees who were always against Jesus and what He said, time and time again. I see we have them here on this forum, too — in spite of what the Bible tells Christians to do…
357 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:32:15 PM by Star Traveler
To: Star Traveler From your #305 post, you did't even know that the Good Smaritan was the one who stopped to help the injured traveler! You're a fraud, a typical poseur trying to quote the Bible to manipulate readers. Here is your exact sentence from #305:
Star Traveler: I think he did, in regards to the question of “Who is my neighbor” and who helped the injured Samaritan along the road (Samaritans were the enemies of Israel...)
361 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:41:15 PM by MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
You said — “You’re a fraud, a typical poseur trying to quote the Bible to manipulate readers.”
It’s the exact same thing I’ve been posting, from the Bible, since the beginning on Free Republic. You’ll find no difference from Clinton, to Bush to Obama... You just don’t like the content of what is being posted, and that’s your problem. But, I won’t be changing my posting.
—
The Samaritan was the person who helped. I’ll quote the section for you... Luke 10:25-37
…
369 posted on Thursday, December 25, 2008 9:54:35 PM by Star Traveler
Yes, I’d say you’re a fraud. You’ve tried to scam readers by quoting Bible verses you don’t even have enough familiarity with to know the role of the story participants, and you tried to twist your lie into stating something opposite of what you stated. ]]
The only scam that is going on is you continually trying to say I’m posting on DU and I’m a liberal and so on. You keep bringing that up and I keep pointing to my posting here and yet — you bring it up again.
You get desperate and trying to post anything and everything you can... LOL..
Now, that’s a scam, if there ever was one. :-)
And it all comes down to you not liking that another conservative does not buy into your Obama Derangement Syndrome.
Sorry, I just don’t go for the conspiracy theories and the hoaxes...
Rush actually has mentioned this issue in the past, even citing the Berg suit and noting that Berg is a Clinton Democrat.
We need another vanity to tell us this?
Do you believe the BC issue ia a conspiracy? If it is, it must be the conspiracy of the faux-president and his minions hiding the documents. What other conspiracy could there be?
The “Obama Derangement Syndrome” and the “conspiracy theories” go hand-in-hand. They are not one and the same, but they feed into one another.
For example, if one thinks that the courts should act on this, on mere speculation and no proof (that’s the Obama Derangement Syndrome) and some judge should “order” the office of President of the United States vacated with an order to a US Marshal to escort Obama out of the White House (again part of the Obama Derangement Syndrome) — then — when it does *not happen* — it’s clear evidence that the U.S. court system is in “cahoots” with Obama and protecting him (that’s the “conspiracy theory”)....
So, the one feeds the other and they both work hand-in hand...
I heard him say that. Rush knows.
Okay, we get it now (LOL) Asking the POTUS to be Constitutionally fit is a conspiracy. When there is justifiable doubts and he's asked to prove it with a lousy piece of paper to the country he is in charge of, he spends money to keep it sealed. We wonder why, and we're kooks.
And I almost forgot, LOL If we are kooks in your book, I wonder what that makes you?
C'mon, on the level, how much do you make to come here and spout your bilge, line after line after line? Not to mention your condescending naturally abrasive tone, you get extra points or money for that?
Discovery is precisely what the obamanoid has hired three law firms to prevent. I’m sure you can figure out why that is vital for him, to maintain his fraud-front.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.