Skip to comments.
Don’t Call it “Darwinism” [religiously defended as "science" by Godless Darwinists]
springerlink ^
| 16 January 2009
| Eugenie C. Scott and Glenn Branch
Posted on 01/28/2009 11:36:17 AM PST by Coyoteman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,321-1,329 next last
To: metmom
You’re a Creationist because of your religion.
61
posted on
01/28/2009 3:50:59 PM PST
by
CE2949BB
(Fight.)
To: scottdeus12
The ToE is the creation account of the atheist and secular humanist. It’s all they have to explain origins.
62
posted on
01/28/2009 3:52:31 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Coyoteman
Are you suggesting that evolution, a science which fully follows the scientific method, is not permitted in conservatism, or on this website?The ToE is based on forensic evidence. Aside from dating and chemical analysis, exactly how is evolution tested in the lab?
What predictions is it capable of making?
63
posted on
01/28/2009 3:55:19 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom; All
64
posted on
01/28/2009 3:56:31 PM PST
by
CE2949BB
(Fight.)
To: Jim Robinson
65
posted on
01/28/2009 3:59:48 PM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: CE2949BB
I just caught up with my responses and saw the comment in post 57
66
posted on
01/28/2009 4:03:05 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Coyoteman
This is a science thread. Religious dogma has no role in science,
Actually it’s a cult thread. You wouldn’t recognize a science thread if it bit your hands off.
67
posted on
01/28/2009 4:03:30 PM PST
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: CE2949BB
Creationism isn’t a religion though, and that’s the point I was making. It’s been called a religion by evos on this forum.
68
posted on
01/28/2009 4:04:02 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: mgstarr; Coyoteman; Jim Robinson
"
Dont you love being lectured on what belongs here from someone who joined 1/03/09?" How about someone who's name says 11-28-97?
69
posted on
01/28/2009 4:04:43 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Coyoteman
I like your thread title Dog Boy!
70
posted on
01/28/2009 4:07:02 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Coyoteman
Are you suggesting that evolution, a science which fully follows the scientific method, is not permitted in conservatism, or on this website?There's a difference between the thory of evolution and the cult of darwinism, and by now almost any conservative that's been on this site for 24 hours understands you're incapable of telling the difference.
71
posted on
01/28/2009 4:08:24 PM PST
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: Coyoteman
The only scientists that have ever posted here are all creationists.
72
posted on
01/28/2009 4:09:40 PM PST
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: metmom
Not yet but I won’t say never. I have learned that connection lines can jump species or create them and span huge time periods in a single line. See habilis in the chart and read this.
“Diagnostic Features
It is particularity hard to list the features of Homo habilis, because the specimens attributed to habilis (and the reasons the material was placed there) vary widely. The species is a mishmash of traits and specimens, whose composition depends upon what researcher one asks. The simplest way to describe the general features is to describe specimens that are generally considered habilis by most people, and list their relevant traits.”
From:
An introduction to the well known but poorly defined species.
www.archaeologyinfo.com/homohabilis.htm
Like describing a man as “kinda like him but a little bit like him but with the features of that guy”.
Sounds like good science to me!
73
posted on
01/28/2009 4:10:23 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: CE2949BB
“Coyoteman” is over at Darwin Central, high-fiving and yukking it up with his fellow Darwinian Beavises and Buttheads right now, no doubt.
He’s finally “earned” his laurel wreath, for getting banned from Free Republic. He’s been trying to commit Martyrdom-By-Mod for some time now.
He’s finally gotten his Darwin Award, and over a thread that claims “Darwinism” should be discouraged as a moniker, lol.
Poor, poor Darwin, being dumped by his accolytes, on his 200th birthday.
To: Jim Robinson; Coyoteman; metmom; schaef21
Been waiting for this paranoid freakshow to be zotted for a long time.
A wingman passing nearby snapped the moment of JimRob's victory:
Smooth kill, Boss! Don't forget to have your crew chief paint another little red star on your canopy rail. :-)
75
posted on
01/28/2009 4:11:57 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
To: ToGodBeTheGlory
This is a Conservative website. Evo-Atheism has no role in conservatism, nor on any thread on this board other than to show the depths that Satan will go to spread his lies. Please take your NEA-loving cult elsewhere. I believe in a creator, and that the world was created by him. But, how far must I go to be allowed to post here. Must I believe that there were dinosaurs on noah's ark?
76
posted on
01/28/2009 4:12:25 PM PST
by
Ron Jeremy
(sonic)
To: metmom
Personalize, polarize, and try to provoke a reaction.
All I have to do is not give it to you.
77
posted on
01/28/2009 4:14:25 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: ToGodBeTheGlory
Hope I don’t sound like the teacher’s pet echoing JimRob like this, but the way I like to put it is that unless someone’s screen name ends with “Robinson” or “Moderator,” they don’t get to give instructions here.
78
posted on
01/28/2009 4:14:35 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
To: count-your-change
I'll stop using the term Darwinist or Darwinism when the Darwinists stop referring to me as a creationist and/or a fundamentalist, etc.Exactly, cultists need to understand there's a difference between their cult and science, i.e., the theory of evolution and the cult of darwinism.
79
posted on
01/28/2009 4:14:52 PM PST
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: editor-surveyor
The only scientists that have ever posted here are all creationists. You have been around long enough to remember "physicist", who was not a creationist. Or, do you deny that he was a scientist?
80
posted on
01/28/2009 4:16:53 PM PST
by
Ron Jeremy
(sonic)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 1,321-1,329 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson